My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
011717
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Ritter So are we good on that point? Okay <br /> Commissioner Allen What happens in terms of fees if a Minor CUP gets bumped to <br /> Planning Commission'? Does the applicant then pay a higher fee'? I'm assuming yes <br /> Commissioner O'Connor If it doesn't change from minor, I would say it's the same fee <br /> Commissioner Allen But if it comes to us, if it comes in as Minor and it comes to us in <br /> terms of our cost structure that we've done all of the fee restructuring for, we now have <br /> a lot more involvement and work by staff <br /> Beaudin We would not change the fee with the caveat that if something is appealed, <br /> then the appeal fees get paid If the reason changes, if it's beyond something where <br /> staff bumped it up, then it stays the same <br /> Commissioner Allen Okay, and then my other process question had to do with the <br /> timing of when you will be doing an audit for this I know the staff report was a little <br /> loose It said maybe six months we do an audit My recommendation is that we pick a <br /> date and put it on the schedule, otherwise, I'm afraid it won't happen Just think about <br /> the DSP that was done 10-15 years ago said, a lot of things would happen and nothing <br /> happened because people moved onto other projects So I'd say, let's make a <br /> commitment whether it's a year, whether it's six months, and let's build a schedule <br /> Beaudin Can I make it an "if then" for you all to consider because I hear the point and I <br /> think what you're going to find is you're going to see zoning from us for at least the next <br /> year and a half and possibly two, so what I'd like to do is as we come back with the <br /> pieces of the zoning We may bring you things that need to be cleaned up along the <br /> way so you're going to see us a lot unless the Council Work Plan changes If that <br /> happens, then what I would say is we should put a timeframe on it because then you <br /> may never see us again, right'? That's the possibility, but between now and when we're <br /> done with the comprehensive update, you going to see us I'd have to imagine every <br /> nine months at the most <br /> Commissioner Allen Well, let's just say that Let's say a minimum of nine months we'll <br /> be back in our commitment <br /> Chair Ritter What you're saying is that it might come in a month or a couple <br /> Commissioner Allen At least nine months <br /> Beaudin I'll leave that all to you I would ask that you not do that to staff because I <br /> don't know what we're going to be doing in nine months, but I know that when we <br /> schedule the next zoning code update meeting with you all, we'd be more than happy to <br /> talk about the work that we've done so far and successes and not successes we're <br /> having <br /> Commissioner Balch The next phase you're going to know because we're going to <br /> ask <br /> EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 24 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.