My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Policy 10: Provide flexibility in residential development standards and housing type <br /> consistent with the desired community character. <br /> Program 10.1: Use planned unit development (PUD) zoning for residential properties that <br /> have unique characteristics or to accommodate development that does <br /> not fit under standard zoning classifications. <br /> Mixed Use <br /> Policy 16: Encourage mixed-use development which encompasses any combination <br /> of commercial development, housing units, or community facilities in an <br /> integrated development. In areas served by transit, encourage mixed use <br /> and residential densities that support affordable housing and transit. <br /> Policy 18: Establish a well-planned mixture of land uses around the BART Stations. <br /> Zoning and Uses <br /> The project site is zoned PUD — MU (Planned Unit Development— Mixed Use) which permits <br /> residential, live/work, and commercial uses. The project is consistent with this PUD District. <br /> The permitted and conditionally permitted uses for the two sites, including the live/work units, <br /> are those listed on page 13 and 14 of the Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines. <br /> Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines <br /> The following comments pertain to the two development proposals and their consistency with <br /> the Standards and Guidelines. For the Commission's reference, the Standards and Guidelines <br /> are included as Exhibit E and reference page number for each item below is noted in italics <br /> with comments provided thereafter. Unless otherwise noted, the comments pertain to Sites 1 <br /> and 2. <br /> 1. As defined in the Standards and Guidelines, an alley is a "public or private vehicular <br /> drive that is used to access private garages, structured parking, and/or surface parking." <br /> As proposed, both site designs use alleys as accessways within the sites rather than <br /> internal streets as required by the Standards and Guidelines. <br /> Page 22, BI (Site Design and Planning - Site Circulation) <br /> Comments: As proposed, the two sites do not meet this requirement; however, the <br /> applicant is requesting an exception to this TOD requirement since using the alleyways <br /> preserves more open space on site. As discussed at the two work sessions, staff, the <br /> Commission, and the City Council felt that they could support an exception to this <br /> requirement because the projects provide more open space and a better site plan <br /> without internal streets. <br /> 2. The median strip that separates Owens Drive from the diagonal parking should <br /> incorporate shrubs for screening. The guidelines require parking to be screened by low <br /> walls and landscaping. <br /> PUD-85-08-12D, PUD-81-30-86D, and P11-0856 Planning Commission <br /> 12 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.