Laserfiche WebLink
Page 30, 87.1 (Parking Location and Treatment— Development Standards) <br /> Comments: The landscaping plans lans have not been revised to <br /> reflect the installation of <br /> shrubs; however, the applicant is not requesting an exception and has indicated that <br /> this requirement will be met. Staff has added a condition of approval to reflect this <br /> requirement (Exhibit A-1, No. 6). <br /> 3. The live/work units for Site 2 do not meet the minimum 50% requirement of building <br /> frontage along Gibraltar Drive. <br /> Page 12, Live/Work bullet point 2 (Retail and Live/Work Requirements) <br /> Comments: As proposed, the building frontage on Gibraltar Drive has 28% live/work. <br /> The applicant is requesting an exception to this requirement as they feel they are <br /> meeting the intent of the Guidelines. During the joint City Council/Planning Commission <br /> meeting, the Council expressed their concern with the amount of live/work building <br /> frontage that was being provided. <br /> 4. The live/work units on Site 1 do not meet the minimum storefront depth of 40-feet. <br /> Furthermore, as proposed, it does not appear that the live/work units could later be <br /> converted to retail or service uses given the proposed depth. <br /> Page 47, D4.3 (Retail and Live/Work Storefronts - Development Standards) <br /> Comments: The proposed plans indicate a 30-foot depth for the retail, live/work <br /> buildings on Site 1 and 2; however, the applicant has since provided alternative retail <br /> depth plans for Site 1 and 2 for the Commission's consideration (please refer to Exhibit <br /> F). <br /> As shown in the alternative plans for Site 1, the retail, live/work building (building "A"), <br /> located on the west side of the project entry, could have a 40-foot depth if the City <br /> would support moving the building 4-feet south, thereby eliminating the landscaping at <br /> the rear of the garage entrances, and extending the building 6-feet to the north (towards <br /> Owens Drive), which would provide 8-foot deep internal storage areas at the rear of the <br /> spaces, but would reduce the front (Owens Drive) setback from 20-feet to 14-feet. Staff <br /> notes that the minimum setback is 20-feet; 14-feet of pedestrian area and 6-feet of <br /> landscaping (page 15 of the TOD guidelines). Relocating the building and increasing <br /> the depth would change the appearance of the building; however, the alternative design <br /> breaks up the wall massing as there will no longer be a continuous wall line along <br /> Owens Drive. <br /> The alternative plan for the retail, live/work building (building "B"), located adjacent to <br /> the proposed trail on Site 1, would require extending the building 10-feet north, towards <br /> Owens Drive, in order to have a 40-foot depth. Extending the building towards Owens <br /> Drive would reduce the front setback on Owens Drive from 35-feet to 31-feet. The <br /> alternative proposal would also allow the applicant to extend the patio covers of the <br /> PUD-85-08-12D, PUD-81-30-86D, and P11-0856 Planning Commission <br /> 13 of 25 <br />