My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Development Agreement Modifications <br /> On December 6, 1983 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1113 approving the original <br /> Development Agreement between the City of Pleasanton and the developer Callahan-Pentz <br /> Properties, Pleasanton, a California General Partnership. This agreement outlined the facts, <br /> understandings, and intentions related to the development of the Hacienda Business Park <br /> Planned Unit Development. The Planned Unit Development, PUD-81-30, was adopted by the <br /> City Council as Ordinance 1109 on November 22, 1983. The Development Agreement was <br /> approved for a period of twenty-five (25) years which would protect the interests of the citizens <br /> in the quality of their community and environment through the approved Planned Unit <br /> Development (PUD-81-30) as well as protect the investment of the developer through the <br /> planned buildout of Hacienda Business Park. <br /> As discussed in the Background section of this report, the City Council adopted the Hacienda <br /> Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Standards and Design Guidelines to provide direction in <br /> regard to uses, density, affordability, building mass and height, setbacks, open space, parking, <br /> access, and street character for three vacant sites in Hacienda Park (i.e., Sites 1, 2, and 3). <br /> Since the Development Agreement and subsequent amendments did not included and/or <br /> address these TOD Standards and Guidelines, and because the Development Agreement will <br /> expire before development can occur, the applicant is requesting to modify the Development <br /> Agreement to 1) extend the term of the Development Agreement to five years from the date of <br /> approval of the two Development Plans, and incorporate approval of the development <br /> standards and design guidelines of the Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines. <br /> Staff supports the request to extend the Development Agreement and believes that the <br /> Planning Commission should provide a positive recommendation to the City Council. Please <br /> refer to Exhibit J for the Development Agreement Amendments. <br /> PUD CONSIDERATIONS <br /> The Zoning Ordinance of the Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth purposes of the Planned <br /> Unit Development District and "considerations" to be addressed in reviewing a PUD <br /> development plan. Staff has provided those considerations and with staff's analysis below. <br /> 1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br /> welfare: <br /> The proposed projects, as conditioned, meet all applicable City standards concerning public <br /> health, safety, and welfare. The subject developments would include the installation of all <br /> required on-site utilities with connections to municipal systems in order to serve the new <br /> developments. As conditioned, the project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be <br /> accommodated/mitigated by the existing City streets and intersections or required road <br /> changes/improvements outlined in the TOD standards. The structures would be designed to <br /> meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable City <br /> codes. The proposed developments are compatible with the adjacent sites and there uses and <br /> would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area. The project also would <br /> provide affordable rental housing (38 units on each site) and help the City to meet its <br /> requirements for provision of lower income housing. <br /> PUD-85-08-12D, PUD-81-30-86D, and P11-0856 Planning Commission <br /> 21 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.