Laserfiche WebLink
After further discussion and comments from members of the audience, the Mayor asked <br />the Council whether it was still their intention to send the letter to the Director <br />of the Job Corps. It was decided to send the letter, and Mr. Fales was asked to <br />summarize the current draft. <br />Mayor Long concluded the matter by saying that the letter would be an open letter and <br />that it would be typed in final form to be sent pending Council approval at the next <br />meeting. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Application of Sam W. Garlitz, 225 W. Angela St., for an Amendment to Ord. No. 309 <br />rezoning all that area bounded on the;south by W. Angela St., on the west by St. <br />Augustine St., on the north by Rose Ave.. on the east by the C -C District, from the <br />R -1 to the RG -15 District <br />Mr. Fales reported on the above matter pointing out that the staff report regarding <br />this matter was forwarded with the agenda for September 13, 1965. He went on to say <br />that the proposed rezoning was in conformance with the General Plan and that approval <br />was being recommended. <br />Mayor Long asked whether anyone in the audience wished to speak on the above matter. <br />No one addressed the Chair. Mayor Long then asked the City Clerk whether there were <br />any protests filed against this application, and after being informed that there <br />were none, he stated that he would entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing. <br />After some discussion, it was moved by Councilman McWilliams and seconded by Council <br />man Cairo that the public hearing be closed. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Cairo, Harding, McWilliams, and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Bubics <br />After some discussion Councilman Harding introduced Ordinance No. 421 amending Ordi- <br />nance No. 309 rezoning all that area bounded on the south by W. Angela St., on the <br />west by St. Augustine St., on the north by Rose Ave., and on the east by the C -C <br />District, from the R -1 to the RG -15 District. <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br />Report of the Plannin: Commission Re: Assignment of Zonin: Districts to the Area o <br />Blvd. Annex "B" <br />Annexation No. 38. Stanle <br />Mr. Fale's summarized the report of the Planning Commission on the above matter which <br />recommended to the City Council that the entire area of Annex No. 38 be zoned at <br />this time from the interim R -1 to a permanent R -1 designation. Mr. Fales went on to <br />say that the Commission considered the existence of R -1 zoning in the subject area, <br />the general existence of R -G zoning in the City, and the location of the Del Valle <br />Parkway on the General Plan before th'e decision was made. <br />Mr. Fales also indicated that the Commission was recommending to the City Council <br />that sufficient funds be allocated to complete the engineering work required to <br />finalize the alignment of the Del Valle Parkway. In addition, the Commission recom- <br />mended to the Council that funds be appropriated to determine the timing or phasing <br />of additional RG zoning in the City. <br />After some discussion it was moved by Councilman Harding and seconded by Councilman <br />McWilliams that the Public Hearing on the above matter be scheduled for October 18, <br />1965. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Cairo, Harding, McWilliams, and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Bubics <br />Report of the Planning Commission Re: Assignment of Zoning Districts to the Area of <br />Annexation No. 39, "Lynnwood Annex" <br />Mr. Fales summarized the report of the Planning Commission on the above matter which <br />recommended to the City Council that the area of Annexation No. 39 be zoned from <br />interim "A" Agricultural to a permanent "A" Agricultural District. Mr. Fales <br />stated that the Commission's action was based upon existing and proposed land use <br />and the apparent rate of development of the area. He went on to say that the pro- <br />posed zoning would be in accordance with the annexation agreement executed between <br />the property owner and the City. <br />2. 9 -27 -65 <br />