Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />of <br />THE MEETING <br />of <br />THE CITY COUNCIL <br />Pleasanton, California <br />September 27, 1965 <br />THE CITY COUNCIL met in Regular Session at 8:00 P.M. on the above date with Mayor <br />Long presiding. <br />ROLL CALL by the City Clerk evidenced the following attendance: Councilmen Cairo, <br />Harding, McWilliams, and Mayor Long present. Councilman Bubics was absent. Mr. <br />Fales, City Manager, Mr. Struthers, City Attorney, Mr. Campbell, City Engineer, and <br />Mrs. Woodward, City Clerk, were present. <br />PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG was led by Mayor Long. <br />MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL <br />Mr. Dana McGaugh of 218 Abbie Street, Pleasanton, California, addressed the Council <br />in the matter of the letter that was to be sent to the Director of the Job Corps. <br />This letter was to be a reaffirmation of the understanding between the City and the <br />Job Corps personnel concerning visitations of Corpsmen to the City. More specifi- <br />cally, it was understood that no Corpsman would be permitted to enter the City <br />without prior invitation or without the accompanyment of a Counselor. <br />Mr. McGaugh went on to say that, in his opinion, the "official action" that was take;: <br />by the City was illegal and immoral. With regard to the illegality of the matter <br />he stated that the problem was apparently discussed in the Personnel Session that <br />was scheduled and held on the date of the last Council meeting. He went on to say <br />that the matter of the Job Corps was not a matter that was announced prior to the <br />actual discussion or a matter that could legally be discussed in a Personnel Session. <br />He therefore stated that the discussion and ultimate action taken by the Council was <br />in violation of the 1957 Brown Act. In addition, he pointed out that, in his <br />opinion, the Job Corps was indicted without due process of law, thereby violating <br />the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. <br />With specific reference to the immorality of the situation, Mr. McGaugh stated that, <br />in his opinion, the Council had acted on the basis of rumor and hearsy without <br />possession of any of the facts, and as a result the action seemed arbitrary. <br />He concluded by requesting that the Council reconsider its action and withdraw the <br />letter that was to be sent. In addition, he urged that the Council take positive <br />steps to get acquainted with the Job Corps and work out the problems on an informal <br />basis as the need arose. <br />Mr. Struthers admonished the Council in regard to any further statements that were <br />to be made since there were obvious charges of violating the 1957 Brown Act, which <br />is punishable by fine and imprisonment. <br />Mayor Long, speaking on behalf of the Council, related the rather long and involved <br />history of the agreement between the City and the Job Corps regarding visitations to <br />the City by Corpsmen. He went on to say that the policy, stipulating corpsmen <br />visitations based upon invitations and the accompanyment of Counselors, was a policy <br />that was in fact suggested by the Job Corps people, and ascertained as acceptable <br />by the City. Mayor Long stated that the policy was established as a result of the <br />obvious impracticality of permitting a large number of single, adult males in this <br />age group to enter a City which had no recreational facilities and a small police <br />force. He continued by stating that the letter was an attempt by the City to re- <br />affirm the agreement between the City and the Job Corps but was not provoked by any <br />specific incident, but rather by a series of unrelated and numerous complaints re- <br />garding the fact that Corpsmen were seen at night on the City's street corners. <br />Mayor Long concluded by saying that it was not the desire of the City or City <br />Council to be arbitrary in this matter, and that constructive suggestions and <br />solutions were always welcome. <br />Councilmen Harding and Cairo reaffirmed the Mayor's statements and emphasized the <br />fact that the agreement that was being reiterated in the letter to the Job Corps <br />was a result of a suggested policy by the Job Corps personnel. They also pointed <br />out that the Council was open to any and all suggestions in this matter and would <br />welcome a better solution to the problem. <br />9 -27 -65 <br />