Laserfiche WebLink
Soo: It used to be, but today I went there and it's not there so we can strike that (42). <br />Commissioner Balch: On 43, 1 had a quick question. So we all know we can change the <br />outside of our house ground floor or cannot without a permit because of the new thing, <br />so this is a standard requirement, is it not for one -story buildings? Typically, with a one <br />story, if you're going to modify the first story in Pleasanton you need a building permit or <br />design review? <br />Soo: This is a commercial building, so any change needs design review <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So number 44; clean and orderly. Do we want to address <br />storage things at this time? <br />Commissioner Balch: Exterior ancillary buildings? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: I don't have a problem with having something or some type of <br />storage out there but something that is a single unit that's large enough to hold it, that's <br />approved, that meets all the standards. Having 10 little things that could look unsightly... <br />Commissioner Nagler: What do we care? It's in the backyard. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: No, it's in the side yard where it is visible. <br />Commissioner Balch: Isn't the backyard a landscaped buffer zone? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: This one side is visible. You can see it from the roadways. So <br />imagine your neighbors putting a couple of ancillary buildings on the side of their house <br />that fronts onto your street, a corner lot or something. <br />Chair Ritter: But that's what that question says. <br />Commissioner Nagler: How about this — "Any exterior ancillary structure needs to be <br />approved by the City." So basically you eliminate that "over 150 feet" or whatever it <br />is...." <br />Commissioner Balch: In theory, what if they want to build a dog house? <br />Commissioner Nagler: So it would just eliminate the minimum; that we would impose a <br />condition that "any exterior structure intended to be permanent requires a permit or <br />approval." <br />Chair Ritter: Do we do that already? <br />Beaudin: no. <br />Chair Ritter: Then why do we want to do that? <br />Commissioner Nagler: I don't care, but obviously I'm trying to respond to Greg's point. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 51 of 56 <br />