My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062216
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 062216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:44:44 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:33:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor: The neighborhood was concerned there were multiple <br />buildings and they weren't very attractive. It wasn't that they put one back there and had <br />two in the backyard. They've got multiple out there and it clutters up the look. <br />Chair Ritter: I see what you're saying but I don't know if I want to mandate that. <br />Commissioner Balch: The ancillary buildings I think are the big question. So I was <br />initially very against the ancillary buildings and probably still am because of the concept <br />of them being very large and several of them and all that. But, if they're simple sheds <br />that they went and got at Home Depot that are 5 feet by 6 six or something, I'm <br />personally not addressing that in a CUP. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So if they are all 100 square feet and there are 10 of them <br />and they look kind of unsightly? <br />Commissioner Balch: Look, the building code's been here long before I have been here <br />and it addresses things like that. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So let me ask staff. Under number 44, "The applicant shall <br />maintain the site in an orderly manner at all times ". I haven't been out to look at these <br />little buildings for a long time, but if they were unsightly, would number 44 as written, <br />would that kind of control the need or do you need something a little more prudent than <br />that? <br />Beaudin: You know, unsightly is such a subjective term. What I would say is <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Orderly manner -so if they've all got dry rot but they are all <br />orderly lined up, is that okay? <br />Beaudin: I'm not sure that I would try and regulate the structures with this language. For <br />me there are paint tanks and other things that have kind of been strewed about and <br />there's outdoor storage of materials. <br />Commissioner Balch: Why don't we adopt something similar to that for garages? <br />Beaudin: What I would say is that if you're concerned about multiple buildings, then <br />maybe set a maximum of up to three or four, or one accessory structure and then <br />beyond that, they would need to come to the City to make sure they look consistent, are <br />sited appropriately, there's landscape screening perhaps, so they would get a permit. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So we could restate the code by saying anything over 120 <br />square feet or any combination more than three structures need to be permitted. <br />Commissioner Balch: 120 square feet is already there. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Yes, but you don't want to say three and they go out there <br />and they do one that's 200. We don't want to eliminate these. I think to say, "Any <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 52 of 56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.