PC 062216 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chair Ritter: Three. Commissioner Balch: I'm not there personally, but you guys .... I can't see requiring a structure to be removed because it's old and it has chipped paint and that they did it to annoy others. It might be just fine with me frankly. Commissioner O'Connor: But Jack, it could be approved if it was slightly and not unsightly. It could be. They just need approval. Commissioner Balch: You don't have to get me there but I'm not there. Commissioner Nagler: Okay Mr. Chair, what do you want to do on this? Chair Ritter: We've just got to get it with three and move on and they need to get a permit for more and let that process happen. Number 45. Commissioner Balch: Done, because you need that now. 46 is good and 47 as well. Weinstein: Sorry, could I just suggest one additional condition and it was related to something that Mike Miller brought to our attention and that's that some of the accessory structures are possibly being used for cooking, so I think we just need to make clear as part of our new Condition 44.a. that the ancillary structure shall only be used for storage. Chair Ritter: Absolutely. Commissioner Balch: They're large enough for that? Chair Ritter: So they're cooking inside it? Weinstein: It's possible there is outdoor cooking of some sort. Regardless of whether it's happening or not —it's probably hard to verify but I think just clarifying that the structure should only be used for storage is probably a good thing. Commissioner O'Connor: Because if it was being used for cooking that would require a permit anyway. Weinstein: Yes, it's a whole different thing, so clarifying that is helpful. Chair Ritter: So did you get enough? Weinstein: Yes. Chair Ritter: So shall we make a motion? Jack, since you had most of the thoughts. Commissioner O'Connor: Just say "as amended." PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 54 of 56