Laserfiche WebLink
accessory structure over 120 square feet or any combination of structures more than <br />three or four must obtain a permit." <br />Commissioner Balch: May I suggest an alternate? How about no more than two <br />ancillary structures ?" <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Yes, but any one over 120 square feet is in the code. <br />Commissioner Allen: You know, I'm just feeling like we're nitpicking and I mean, to me, <br />the propane tanks and the lighter fluid that's in the backyard is more concerning to me <br />than these structures if they're by code. I would sort of say 44 conceptually covers it— <br />"The applicant shall maintain the site in a clean and orderly manner." I would request <br />the City work with the applicant to identify where there are gaps where it's not clean and <br />orderly and get those resolved in the next 30 days or something. <br />Chair Ritter: I agree. <br />Commissioner Balch: I'm fine with that. <br />Beaudin: Accessory structures I would say are different than 44. If the idea is to get <br />things looking neat and tidy up there.... <br />Commissioner Allen: .... and safe in terms of the propane tanks. <br />Commissioner Balch: Maybe I could do it differently —could we say no accessory <br />structures in the buffer zone? Or are we okay with it? <br />Chair Ritter: That's actually a good spot to put it. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: That would actually say they can't have any because the west <br />and north sides are buffer zones. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Just say "outdoor ancillary buildings are permitted in <br />conformance with the code up to three. Any over three requires permission from the <br />City." <br />Chair Ritter: How many do they have right now, five? <br />Weinstein: Yes, something like that. <br />Commissioner Balch: Is there a health, safety or concern about the five that they have? <br />Weinstein: They just don't look that great. They're portable sheds or semi - portable and <br />they're old. The paint is peeling and they don't look that great. I think Commissioner <br />Nagler's idea of limiting the accessory structures to three or something like that is good <br />and so they can consolidate what they have. Even if they are a little old looking and the <br />paint's not that great, having three instead of five or having two instead of five would be <br />a lot better than what it is now. So we would recommend that. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 53 of 56 <br />