Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Memorandum November 30, 2017 <br /> Tri-Valley Fee Comparison and Page 3 <br /> Pleasanton's Competitiveness Assessment and Economic Implications <br /> Table 2 Summary of Development Impact Fee Categories for Selected Cities <br /> Fee Category Pleasanton Dublin Livermore San Ramon Fremont <br /> Affordable X X X X <br /> Housing <br /> Parks X X X <br /> Traffic/ X X X X X <br /> Transportation <br /> Capital X X X <br /> Facilities <br /> Fire X X <br /> Noise X <br /> Mitigation <br /> Social and Human <br /> Service Facility X <br /> Specific Plan <br /> Recovery Fees X <br /> Tri-Valley <br /> Transportation X X X X <br /> Development <br /> Source:Cities of Pleasanton,Dublin,Livermore,San Ramon,and Fremont <br /> As summarized in Table 3, excluding the affordable housing component, the maximum allowable <br /> fee levels supported by the draft Nexus Report are more or less in line with those of other <br /> jurisdictions. Specifically, the maximum allowable residential public facilities fee falls below <br /> those in Dublin, Livermore, and Fremont but above San Ramon. On the nonresidential side, <br /> Pleasanton's maximum allowable fee is generally higher than the comparison set, with the <br /> exception of San Ramon for the Office category only and Livermore. The maximum allowable <br /> housing fee is substantially above any other fee charged by other Tri-Valley jurisdictions or the <br /> existing fee in Pleasanton but again Cities rarely the full amount. <br /> P\151000s\151111PleasantonFee\Corres\151111 PleasantonDlFMemo3.docx <br />