Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 2: PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> How do Decisions of DSP Task Force(2/25/19) Compare to Goals* <br /> Goals of task Benefits Increases retail Increases Retain unique Process Process Notes <br /> force/ existing footprint of retail character;have Strong public Implications <br /> residents existing vibrancy buffer between input; shared/well <br /> 2/27 Decisions commercial uses transparent understood <br /> Allow ground floor N N N N N N True y3lue store is 175"deep. <br /> res behind 50' -Allows True Value to be cut by <br /> commercial or less over 2/3rd with res.behind. <br /> Reduces retail footprint/sales tax, <br /> increases res parking on street and <br /> no transition buffer for residents <br /> !r• p <br /> Ir <br /> 1 <br /> . <br /> I <br /> ys <br /> Increase FAR to N N N N N N -Risks 3 story dense buildings all <br /> 300%in over commercial district. And <br /> commercial area likely with mostly residential as <br /> that is where developer profits. <br /> -No discussion of implications at <br /> 2/27 DSP meeting. <br /> Building height N N N N N N -Buildings 10-15 feet taller than <br /> increased to 46 Spring Street <br /> feet -Residential could be"66%to 75% <br /> of existing commercial district. <br /> Rezone Barone's in N N N N N Postcard/agenda N(see Planning -Why isn't zoning upgrade part of <br /> advance of a PUD never mentioned Commissionminutes normal PUD process? <br /> to allow res.and <br /> Barone's. from 3/13) -Inconsistent with public input <br /> No detailed staff <br /> more <br /> report a workshop <br /> Active ground floor Y Y V V Y Y Very good start. <br /> Code: X=no: Y=yes <br /> 'This table focuses on existing commercial footprint as that is all that is a given. Town square speculative. <br /> 20 <br />