My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
020420
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2020 5:28:08 PM
Creation date
1/28/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
11 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\020420
11 ATTACHMENT 5A
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\020420
11 ATTACHMENTS 6-9
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\020420
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 PUD-105 and P 14-0852 <br /> July 9,2019 <br /> JDEDZ <br /> accordance with these legislative changes,the City has added analysis of the project's GHG emissions to the <br /> recirculated SEIR. <br /> Pursuant to revised section 15064.4 and Appendix G of the Guidelines,the City has discretion whether to assess <br /> GHG emissions quantitatively or qualitatively and to establish thresholds of significance. Since there is no <br /> applicable quantitative threshold(e.g.,neither the City's CAP nor the Bay Area Air Quality Management <br /> District's emissions threshold are qualified to be consistent with SB 32's 2030 targets),the City used the <br /> qualitative threshold provided in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.4(b),which considers whether the Project <br /> complies with applicable plans,policies,regulations,and requirements adopted to implement a statewide, <br /> regional,or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. <br /> The California Air Resources Board's 2017 Scoping Plan Update is intended to reduce GHG emissions to meet <br /> the statewide targets set forth in SB 32. The Association of Bay Area Governments' (ABAG)and Metropolitan <br /> Transportation Commission's(MTC)Plan Bay Area 2040 is designed to achieve regional GHG reductions from <br /> the land use and transportation sectors as required by SB 375 and the state's long-term climate goals. The City's <br /> CAP is designed to reduce local GHG emissions to support the statewide target for 2020 set forth in AB 32 and <br /> put the City on an emissions trajectory that is consistent with the State's longer-term targets. <br /> The City's GHG analysis determined that the project would be consistent with the 2017 Scoping Plan Update, <br /> Plan Bay Area 2040,and the City's CAP. The analysis found that because the Project is consistent with these <br /> applicable plans and policies to reduce GHG emissions,and because the Project implements certain project <br /> design features(e.g.EV charging stations),the Project would generate an incremental contribution to climate <br /> change compared to existing conditions,but would not generate enough GHG emissions on its own to <br /> significantly influence global climate change. Therefore,the analysis determined that the project would not <br /> have a sijnifcant effect on the environment. <br /> Energy Resources Technical Memorandum <br /> The technical memorandum analyzes the impacts on energy resources due to construction and operation of the <br /> JDEDZ. In accordance with the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines,specifically Appendix G, Environmental <br /> Checklist,and Appendix F,Energy Conservation,this assessment provides an estimate of energy consumption <br /> for the JDEDZ and the potential impacts from associated construction and operational activities.The assessment <br /> includes the categories and types of energy consumption resulting from the JDEDZ,the calculation procedures <br /> used in the analysis,and any assumptions or limitations. <br /> Construction of the JDEDZ would occur in two phases. Phase 1 would begin in 2020 with a one-year duration <br /> and Phase 2 would begin in 2030 with a one-year duration. Each of the construction phases would utilize energy <br /> for necessary on-site construction activities and to transport materials,soil,and debris to and from the site. <br /> Phase 1 construction would consume approximately 114,345 gallons of diesel and 19,813 gallons of gasoline <br /> during the one-year construction timeframe. Phase 2 construction would consume approximately 64,504 gallons <br /> of diesel and 14,051 gallons of gasoline during the one-year construction timeframe. <br /> Phase 1 diesel consumption would represent approximately 0.10 and 0.003 percent of total 2017 diesel fuel <br /> consumption in Alameda County and California,respectively. Phase 1 gasoline consumption would represent <br /> approximately 0.006 and 0.0002 percent of County and State 2017 gasoline consumption,respectively. Phase 2 <br /> diesel consumption would represent approximately 0.06 and 0.002 percent of County and State 2017 diesel <br /> consumption,respectively. Phase 2 gasoline consumption would represent approximately 0.002 and 0.0001 <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTāP.O. BOX 520, Pleasanton,CA 94566-0802 <br /> Planning Building&Safety Engineering Traffic Inspection <br /> 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 157 Main St. <br /> (925)931-5600 (925)931-5300 (925)931-5650 (925)931-5650 (925) 931-5680 <br /> Fax: 931-5483 Fax: 931-5478 Fax: 931-5479 Fax: 931-5479 Fax 931-5484 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.