My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
021820
>
11 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2020 1:59:47 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 1:55:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/18/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
11
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\021820
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF <br /> East Pleasanton Specific Plan <br /> Public Comments pL-EASANTON. <br /> As you are well aware, the community's desire to weigh in on the planning of the East Side has <br /> precedence. There were significant numbers of residents (over 1,000 attendees in the past East <br /> Side neighborhood meetings and City Council meetings)who opposed the past plans for the <br /> EPSP. Some of you are on record having voted to stop the planning process until the community <br /> weighed in on an advisory vote as indicated in 5/19/15 City Council Meeting minutes. <br /> The residents still want a vote in order to have their opinions heard. Many residents are also <br /> concerned about the timing of this agenda item prior to the Thanksgiving and now the Winter <br /> holidays when people are distracted by the family obligations and activities, and see this as a <br /> direct thwarting of their democratic rights to have their opinions heard by their elected <br /> representatives . <br /> It is important that the public be made aware of any developments or proposals that will <br /> significantly impact their quality of life in Pleasanton like those currently being entertained on <br /> the EPSP. <br /> Making the East Side planning process transparent and a legitimate process requires you to keep <br /> your promise and let the voters decide whether we should plan for the EPSP prior to the 2022-23 <br /> RHNA Cycle. <br /> I urge you to begin the Planning of the East Side only after there is an advisory vote of the <br /> residents as promised in 2015 and once the RHNA numbers have been allocated in late 2020. <br /> The future East Side development will have a significant impact on our community's resources <br /> and the quality of life for our residents. Make this planning process a transparent and open <br /> process that involves more than a home builder and the stake holders who will profit from the <br /> development. Our community prides itself on it's history of engaging in and providing protection <br /> to the community for the greater good,not the pockets of the influential lobbyist and home <br /> developers. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Kelly Cousins <br /> Provided to City Council for the February 18, 2020, Meeting 74 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.