7_Exhibits A, C & D - Laserfiche WebLink

with all zoning and general heights in the surrounding area. Chair Brown asked if there was an architectural reason for these buildings being just over 30 feet. Ms. Hagen stated she had not heard a reason. Commissioner Allen stated she would like the height, with the exception of the dome, to be 30 feet as recommended by staff. She suggested a single story versus two story for the community center building. She requested additional articulation where visible and appropriate. Commissioner Gaidos agreed with articulation and indicated support for the architecture, detailing, design, colors and materials and proposed building and dome height. Commissioner Pace stated the applicant had done a nice job and suggested additional breaking of massing on the second story. Commission Ritter agreed that the design as submitted was close to the 30-foot requirements and reminded his fellow Commissioners to not rule from the bench. Commissioner Nibert expressed his agreement with the materials mentioned for Discussion Point 4a. Ms. Hagen confirmed the additional stone elements and gable. He suggested the applicant provide information on the height over 30 feet. Chair Brown stated the dome height was acceptable. He agreed with Commissioner Ritter on the building height and requested the applicant explain the heights over 30 feet. Conclusion Discussion Point#5 5. Is there additional information needed to assist the Commission in its decision on the proposal? Commissioner Allen stated she was very impressed with the project and thanked the community for its support and applicant for the beautiful design. Commissioners Gaidos and Pace echoed Commissioner Allen. Commissioner Ritter stated he loved the community benefits provided by this project. Commissioner Nibert echoed the other Commissioners. Chair Brown thanked all the speakers and stated he liked the proposal. Excerpt: Approved Planning Commission Minutes, April 14, 2021 Page 5 of 5 would work with the project team to determine the trees to be preserved. Commissioner Nibert then asked about trees to be removed due to construction conflicts. Ms. Hagen explained the trees to be removed in the small area on the southwest corner for the new driveway and emergency access lane. In response to Commissioner Nibert, Ms. Hagen explained the trees in the riparian area were being removed for health and safety reasons. Discussion Point #4 4. a) Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building architecture and detailing, design, colors, and materials? b) Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building and dome heights? Chair Brown asked about Staff's concerns with the buildings being over 30 feet. Ms. Hagen explained that staff would like all buildings, with the exception of the dome, to be consistent Excerpt Approved Planning Commission Minutes, April 14; 2021 Page 4 of 5 ly 45 feet between the home and the church building. She stated the sanctuary building and dome would be approximately 200 feet from the property line. Commissioner Pace asked the visual impacts and potential privacy issues. Ms. Hagen explained there were no second story windows on the west side of the building that would provide views of adjacent properties. Excerpt: Approved Planning Commission Minutes, April 14, 2021 Page 1 of 5 e type, location, and sizing calculations of the PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission Page 16 of 25 PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission Page 3 of 25 YCROSSCRISFIELD .*- 4-; -,47÷-'' 1.1--1 ''.-. HAM ;-----fk;s7,4G il 3` • kst • .7 I DIJNIYA1:1%, ..4.. ,i4is' '1 , „J 10 ,,,... ‘1 'kTIAV - 1) \ ‘ ' ?) $.Y \t, ,2:2/ \ ‘ 111-,-,: . ,..... i ..., i 1:11,343 o 0.125 0.25 mi PUD-140, Townsend, Lot Line, 2207 Martin Ave Planning Division =-- -.• .-.... , 1:16 I i II May 10,2021 FLEA:.,ANTON. 0 650 1,300 Feet