7_Exhibits A, C & D - Laserfiche WebLink

Ritter stated the dome height seemed appropriate and the massing was much less than the Orthodox Church in Oakland. He stated he liked the trash enclosure design and layout. Commission Nibert stated the circulation, trash enclosure, and delivery area were acceptable. He asked about the phasing of construction and location of utilities. Ms. Hagen stated the undergrounding would be between the east and west property lines. She stated the improvement plan and grading were Phase 1, the Sanctuary building was Phase 2, and the Community Building was Phase 3a, b, and c. Chair Brown expressed his agreement with the elements noted in Discussion Point #2. Discussion Point #3 3. Is the tree removal and proposed landscaping along Dublin Canyon Road appropriate? Chair Brown asked if the utilities could be undergrounded without disturbing the existing trees. Ms. Hagen stated efforts would be made to retain trees, but the plan was not yet finalized. Commissioner Allen asked about the tree species being proposed to replace the trees along Dublin Canyon Road and the height at five years. Ms. Hagen stated Red Maple would be planted and that staff would work with the landscape architect to ensure lush trees. Commissioner Allen stated she was looking for good screening around the Community Center and parking lot. In response to Chair Brown, Mr. Tassano confirmed the existing short, bushy trees would most likely be removed. Commissioner Gaidos stated his preference to retain as many oak trees as possible. He suggested the pathway meander around the trees, although he did not anticipate a large pedestrian presence due to traffic. Commissioner Pace commended efforts to retain trees and replace any removed with heritage trees. Commissioner Ritter agreed with Commissioners Gaidos and Pace. Commissioner Nibert stated the arborist report indicated a number of trees with severe injuries and asked if the heritage trees would be removed or saved. Ms. Hagen stated the City's landscape architect would work with the project team to determine the trees to be preserved. Commissioner Nibert then asked about trees to be removed due to construction conflicts. Ms. Hagen explained the trees to be removed in the small area on the southwest corner for the new driveway and emergency access lane. In response to Commissioner Nibert, Ms. Hagen explained the trees in the riparian area were being removed for health and safety reasons. Discussion Point #4 4. a) Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building architecture and detailing, design, colors, and materials? b) Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building and dome heights? Chair Brown asked about Staff's concerns with the buildings being over 30 feet. Ms. Hagen explained that staff would like all buildings, with the exception of the dome, to be consistent Excerpt Approved Planning Commission Minutes, April 14; 2021 Page 4 of 5 ly 45 feet between the home and the church building. She stated the sanctuary building and dome would be approximately 200 feet from the property line. Commissioner Pace asked the visual impacts and potential privacy issues. Ms. Hagen explained there were no second story windows on the west side of the building that would provide views of adjacent properties. Excerpt: Approved Planning Commission Minutes, April 14, 2021 Page 1 of 5 e type, location, and sizing calculations of the PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission Page 16 of 25 PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission Page 3 of 25 YCROSSCRISFIELD .*- 4-; -,47÷-'' 1.1--1 ''.-. HAM ;-----fk;s7,4G il 3` • kst • .7 I DIJNIYA1:1%, ..4.. ,i4is' '1 , „J 10 ,,,... ‘1 'kTIAV - 1) \ ‘ ' ?) $.Y \t, ,2:2/ \ ‘ 111-,-,: . ,..... i ..., i 1:11,343 o 0.125 0.25 mi PUD-140, Townsend, Lot Line, 2207 Martin Ave Planning Division =-- -.• .-.... , 1:16 I i II May 10,2021 FLEA:.,ANTON. 0 650 1,300 Feet