My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
101921
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 2:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/13/2021 2:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Design Review <br />The City's discretionary design review process is outlined in Chapter 18.20 of the Municipal Code. <br />The purpose of the design review is to enhance Pleasanton's aesthetic values and ensure the <br />preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare. Thresholds for design review authority are <br />established for review by either the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission. Generally, all <br />models (for a production home project), custom single-family homes, and single-family home <br />additions over 10 feet in height are reviewed by the Zoning Administrator. All new improvements <br />and structures, except those in the PUD Zoning District, are reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission. Therefore, all multi -family and mixed-use developments would require Planning <br />Commission approval, unless City Council approval was required through the PUD process. <br />The review authority must consider various criteria prior to approval of a design review application, <br />including: <br />• Preservation of the natural beauty of the city and the project site's relationship to it. <br />• Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, <br />including compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, attractive <br />landscape transitions, and consistency with neighborhood character. <br />• Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the city, and passersby <br />through the community. <br />Similar to the analysis of Design Standards and Guidelines, the subjectivity of design review <br />criteria could lead to a protracted approval process and potentially a denial based on interpretation. <br />Currently, Senate Bill 330 (Housing Accountability Act) precludes jurisdictions from applying <br />subjective design standards to housing development projects; however, in the future when <br />provisions of Senate Bill 330 sunset on January 1, 2025 (unless otherwise extended by the State), <br />the City should consider revising the design review criteria to reduce subjectivity to the maximum <br />extent feasible. As noted, the City is in the process of developing updated and expanded design <br />standards and guidelines for residential development, in order to reduce subjectivity in the design <br />review process. <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />Certain housing types require conditional use permits (see Table C-6). The City's conditional use <br />permit process is described in Chapter 18.124. Planning Commission is the review authority for <br />conditional use permits, and must make the following findings before approving a conditional use <br />permit: <br />• The proposed location of the use is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning <br />ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. <br />• The proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated <br />or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially <br />injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. <br />C-28 I City of Pleasanton Housing Constraints <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.