My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
101921
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 2:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/13/2021 2:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing Resources — Are there any comments on the Housing Resources (Appendix G)? <br />Commissioner Morgan requested staff work with individuals who provided public comment, to <br />ensure those items and comments were addressed. <br />Existing Programs Review — Are there any comments on the Existing Programs Review <br />(Appendix D)? <br />Commissioner Nibert requested clarification on the term "supportive housing" and if there was <br />a specific connotation or explanation. Ms. Murillo explained that State law specifically defined <br />supportive housing as well as transitional housing. <br />Commissioner Allen suggested bundling 6.2 and 6.3 as a subset of 11.1 related to ADUs. She <br />suggested subset policies such as reduced fees for deed restricted ADUs for lower income <br />and templated ADU designs. Ms. Clark stated the Housing Element provided an opportunity to <br />add new programs and initiatives, if those were of interest to the Planning Commission and <br />City Council. <br />Potential Future Policy Discussion Items: <br />Does the Planning Commission have any comments, additions or changes to the following list <br />of suggested policy topics for future discussion: <br />• New fundinq sources for low-income housing programs <br />• Additional incentives or programs to encourage 100% affordable projects <br />• Evaluation of unique financing programs <br />• Review/update the City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (LO) to ensure it appropriately <br />delivers affordable housing with new market -rate residential development <br />• Additional programs or efforts to address homelessness <br />• Review the Lower Income Housinq Fee and other City fees to ensure development <br />addresses housing demands created <br />• Address "affordability by design" and encourage production of smaller, more affordable <br />market rate units <br />• Consideration of innovative, smaller -scale "missing middle" housing types to provide <br />housing opportunities in scale and character with existing neighborhoods <br />ADU streamlining, including pre -approved ADU Designs <br />Commissioner Gaidos suggested including the outcome of the Housing Commission / City <br />Council discussion from a few years ago, with respect to housing programs. He stated the <br />prevailing sentiment was that those that could afford to build an ADU were not likely renting it <br />to those needing affordable housing, and that it would not be practical to police, regulate or <br />deed restrict ADUs in that manner. He stated the Housing Commission had increased the <br />Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, September 22, 2021 Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.