My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
101921
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 2:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/13/2021 2:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
funding amount the City would provide for first time home buyers, and he suggested this <br />information be noted in the HEU programs analysis. <br />Commissioner Allen provided her top future policy discussions as follows: 1 and 2) Programs <br />and policies to create more affordability and missing middle; 3) Inclusionary zoning (and she <br />provided suggested modification to the language); 4) additional incentives to encourage 100 - <br />percent affordable projects; and 5) Reviewing lower income housing fee. <br />Ms. Clark suggested reviewing the list to determine if there were any that were missing or <br />policies that should be removed. <br />Chair Brown stated it was a comprehensive list that was difficult to prioritize. He suggested a <br />targeted program for homelessness. He requested clarification on "missing middle." Ms. Clark <br />explained that missing middle generally reflected the mid-range scale of multiple -family <br />housing types (e.g. duplexes to fourplexes) and how to build them at a scale that would fit in a <br />typical single-family neighborhood. She stated bills like SB9 were oriented towards the <br />"missing middle" as an effort to create more infill in single family areas. <br />Commissioner Morgan mentioned that the previous RHNA cycle had produced minimal low- <br />income housing, versus that at market rate, so inquired how to increase that rate or <br />percentage and economics of affordable housing. <br />Commissioner Nibert suggested innovation and consideration of all funding sources. <br />Chair Brown asked if there was pooling of resources to determine various sources of funding <br />and types of housing products. Ms. Clark responded that there were various resources and <br />funding at the State level and an opportunity to learn from colleagues. Chair Brown asked if <br />there was a clearing house of information. Ms. Clark discussed the Alameda County <br />Collaborative and ABAG who were actively working to create this type of resource. <br />Commissioner Allen suggested consideration of ways to encourage large-scale corporations to <br />provide land and housing. <br />Commissioner Gaidos supported Commissioner Allen's comment, and reminded the <br />Commission of his suggestion on the 10x Genomics project to provide employee housing. He <br />suggested large corporations contribute to affordable housing. <br />Chair Brown moved to recommend forwarding the draft Preliminary Report, with <br />feedback and comments provided by the Planning Commission, to City Council for <br />consideration. <br />Commissioner Allen seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Allen, Brown, Gaidos, Morgan, and Nibert <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Pace <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, September 22, 2021 Page 6 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.