My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
101921
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 2:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/13/2021 2:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ITEM 4: PUBLIC COMMEP <br />September 16, 2021 <br />Pleasanton Housing Commission <br />Agenda Item 4, Draft Preliminary Update, Housing Element Update <br />Dear Chairman Galvin and Housing Commissioners. <br />Further review of the Staff Report and the Draft Preliminary Report has raised some additional <br />questions. Particularly, the precipitous drop in the portion of Pleasanton residents that work in <br />Pleasanton to a new low of 8% needs some further explanation. This would be helpful to Pleasanton's <br />Commissions and City Council in recommending development sites and housing types. <br />We can learn a lot about reasons for the trends we are seeing through review of population response to <br />housing Pleasanton has built in the past. <br />What does the American Community Survey and other new census tract data tell us? <br />Where do the 8% of households who live and work in Pleasanton currently live? What is the range of <br />their household incomes? How long have they lived in Pleasanton? What size households? What are <br />their ages? For instance, my family settled in Pleasanton in 1988 because buying a house was affordable. <br />Within 15 years we became a live/work household. We would now be classed as both live/work, business <br />owner, and senior citizen. However, we could not afford to buy the house we live in today. I suspect that <br />there are many longer tenure residents like us who are part of the 8%. <br />At the other end of the scale, Pleasanton has added a lot of high density housing around BART. One of <br />these developments includes 15% VLI units. Do the occupants of this relatively new HDR housing work <br />in town, or do they mostly take BART to jobs out of town? Does providing housing close to BART work <br />against the City's environmental need to provide affordable housing opportunities for Pleasanton's <br />essential corporate and service workers? If so, perhaps we should reconsider BART proximate <br />development as the best option for Pleasanton's lower income essential workforce. To meet the City's <br />climate action goals, our priority should be to house Pleasanton's currently commuting workers close to <br />Pleasanton jobs. <br />I hope staff may be able to answer some of these questions tonight, or perhaps in time for future <br />commission and council meetings. I look forward to your discussion of these interesting questions. <br />Best, <br />r3u*, y Dem,� <br />Pleasanton <br />Item 4 - Provided to Housing Commission for the September 16, 2021 Meeting <br />AFTER PACKET DISTRIBUTION 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.