My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 9:34:11 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 9:27:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comments on the Draft CAP 2.0 <br />2021.12.22 <br />Page Comment Comment From <br />Consider allowing an option for electrical storage for new construction: EITHER the new construction include adequate <br />local energy storage (batteries) OR they participate in a community based shared electrical storage system. The Phil Bowman <br />community based system may be more affordable and optimizes the number of batteries required when pooled over a <br />38 larger number of buildings. Tesla is currently piloting a community power -wall storage system in Australia. <br />One important indicator of improved sustainability would be a significant increase in the percentage of Pleasanton <br />residents who work in Pleasanton. Providing housing opportunities for the employees of businesses located, in Becky Dennis <br />39 Pleasanton, most of whom earn 60%AMI or less, will do the most to reduce emissions and VMT. Those earning above <br />80% AMI commute to locations outside the Tri -Valley. <br />Was there any discussion of urban heat islands? This would be in support of "adaptation" rather than reducing GHG <br />39 emissions. The City is currently making our existing streets blacker by resurfacing, thereby making our ambient Todd Nelson <br />temperature hotter which worsens the effects mentioned earlier. Other technologies are available for road surfaces but <br />there are trade-offs. <br />40 Does this include the Alameda County Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program? <br />Todd Nelson <br />remove "those without personal vehicles have" — we should encourage reliable access to alternative transportation for Anonymous <br />40 those with and without personal vehicles. <br />Great to see the City working to phase out pollution (air and noise) from gas powered small engines. With the State of <br />California prohibiting sales of small gas -powered engines in 2024, seems like a great opportunity to educate residents <br />on the 'why' and 'how' of phasing out their own use of lawnmowers, leaf blowers, and more. This should include Jim van Dyke <br />encouraging residents to ask their lawn maintenance service providers to only use electric or manual alternatives, in <br />40 place of high -polluting gas powered devices. <br />Suggest including an education and promotion campaign to encourage use of bicycles over cars. Perhaps sponsor Phil Bowman <br />42 monthly "bike -to -work" days with incentives. <br />Even with Valley Link and BART at capacity, they will only be able to carry a limited percentage of the people who <br />43 currently commute. Encouraging people to telecommute or, if not feasible, live close to their jobs and commute by EV, Jocelyn Combs <br />foot, or bike, will be necessary to achieve our climate goals. <br />44 Can we measure and report numbers for Pleasanton residents who work within Pleasanton? I suspect the balance is Todd Nelson <br />quite bad for those commuting in/out vs those who work locally. A baseline metric would be useful. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.