My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 9:34:11 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 9:27:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page <br />44 <br />44 <br />44 <br />Comments on the Draft CAP 2.0 <br />2021.12.22 <br />Comment <br />Building housing in infill areas will reduce VMT and support active and shared transportation investments. Does this <br />strategy include building more housing? If yes, this should be made more clear. <br />Transportation and Land Use <br />A measure of succes should be an increased percentage of Pleasanton residents who work in Pleasanton. <br />Can we ask the school district to keep a count of students who walk, bike or take a bus vs getting dropped off by car? <br />Having a baseline number would allow us to measure improvement. <br />Comment From <br />Krute Singa <br />Becky Dennis <br />Todd Nelson <br />These key indicators seem very difficult to measure. Is there an objective way to measure things like carbon Phil Bowman <br />49 sequestration or total tree canopy growth? Perhaps photo analysis of before and after satellite photos? <br />Unless I am mistaken Pleasanton can mitigate (in this case sequester carbon) on land outside our city limits but within <br />50 our sphere of influence. This would give use more land, landowners and partners for carbon sequestration. Can you Jocelyn Combs <br />check? <br />I don't see where "Increase use of City Programs" is defined <br />53 delete it. <br />Please explain this and show associated actions. Or else <br />56 "Green infrastructure" and "stormwater management" seem like buzzwords. Are they defined somewhere else? <br />56 I'm thinking it's in this section but earlier I had mentioned permitting use of gray water (sinks and shower/bath, etc.) for <br />irrigation. In light of the drought I think it would be wise to move this up as a priority. <br />Phil Bowman <br />ISTOr10,M0r, <br />Jocelyn Combs <br />While "resilience" and "sustainability" are related, they are not the same. The Performance section shows very little <br />about resilience. Do we need a tri -valley evacuation plan? Do we need an additional fire station closer to fire -prone or <br />57 remote areas? Do we need different fire -fighting equipment for remote areas? What precautions do we need for Todd Nelson <br />radioactivity should Lawrence Livermore lose power or suffer fire damage? Do we need to improve notification in the <br />event of excessive water contamination (PFAS, etc.)? That's what I expected here. <br />59 Use the bottom and back of our utility bill as a monthly update and educational piece, similar to the insert with our Jocelyn Combs <br />garbage bill. <br />59 In addition to Todd's comments I highly recommend community disaster training. All of the community. At least annually. Jocelyn combs <br />Make sure communication systems work <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.