Laserfiche WebLink
Comments on the Draft CAP 2.0 <br />2021.12.22 <br />Page Comment Comment From <br />Please add two columns to the implementation plan showing the carbon saving for each action item and the likelihood <br />64 of grant funding. If there is low carbon savings for high cost consider implementing a high carbon saving item instead. Jocelyn combs <br />However if there is a high like likelihood of grant funds the item could be moved up. <br />66 Absolutely necessary to have adequate staffing! Jocelyn combs <br />67 Please add East Bay Regional Park District, Alameda County RCD, Alameda County Farm Bureau, Lawrence Livermore Jocelyn combs <br />Lab and Scandinavian lab plus many more. We're all in this together and everyone has a part to play. <br />72 Every three years for GHG emissions surveys sounds too infrequent to measure how we are doing. What would it take Jocelyn combs <br />to increase this to every year? <br />"Miles of new infrastructure" is not a defined metric in the Bike/Ped Master Plan. Is this a readily available metric from <br />73 the City? Regardless, I think "mode share" is a better metric because it covers multiple modes of travel (even though I Todd Nelson <br />question the accuracy of that number ...as a member of the Bike/Ped & Trails Committee). <br />