My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 9:59:08 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 9:53:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: SteveMcKinlev <br />To: Natalie Amos <br />Subject: Home on Trenery Lane <br />Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:08:31 AM <br />Att: Natalie Amos <br />RE: Project P21 -0132,P21-0133, PUD -142 <br />Members of the Planning Commission, my name is Steve McKinley and I have livec <br />at Martin Avenue since 1988. We bought our home new... as it was being built. <br />One of the neighbors objected to our fence and filed a complaint with the City. The <br />fence was/is to "CODE", but the Architectural Review Board thought a "Steel" fence <br />would look nicer and Voted 5-0 to take down our fence and spend the OUR (not <br />theirs) money to replace it. We had to take the issue it to the City Council and they <br />voted 5-0 that the fence was perfectly fine. What a waste of our time and the City's. <br />The City had a 15 page report on the issue, proving we were just fine. <br />I see that same kind of attitude from people. Once they have "theirs" they don't want <br />anyone else to have "theirs". Almost ALL the neighbors on their street (and in our <br />neighborhood) have 2 -story homes. They are not setting some new precedence <br />period. <br />I welcome the new neighbors and urge the Planning Commission to approve their <br />application. <br />Steven A. McKinley <br />Click here to report this email as spam. <br />ITEM NO. 6, PUD -144, PUBLIC COMMENTS PAGE 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.