My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:13 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 10:22:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PUD-138 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8616 Planning Commission <br />17 of 28 <br /> <br />The proposed development standards are consistent with HVSP’s development standards for <br />PUD-SRDR lots, except for the lot width, whose narrowest proposed width (165 feet) would be <br />less than the minimum stated in the HVSP. <br /> <br />The proposed project includes a PUD development plan. §18.68.020 of the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code (PMC) pertaining to the purpose of PUD districts states that the district is <br />intended to accomplish the following: <br /> <br />A. To encourage imagination and housing variety in the development of property of <br />varying sizes and topography in order to avoid the monotony and often destructive <br />characteristics of standard residential, commercial and industrial developments; <br />B. To provide a development procedure which will ensure that the desires of the <br />developer and the community are understood and approved prior to commencement <br />of construction; <br />C. To ensure that the goals and objectives of the city’s general plan are promoted <br />without the discouragement of innovation by application of restrictive developmental <br />standards; <br /> <br />§18.68.060 of the PMC pertaining to property development standards states the following: <br /> <br />A. In order to allow the greatest amount of flexibility in designing a project compatible with <br />the physical features of the property, the uses intended to be developed thereon, and <br />the objectives of this chapter, no minimum property development standa rds shall apply <br />to the PUD district. The planning commission and city council shall determine <br />appropriate amounts of landscaping, natural open space, parking, signing, distances <br />between buildings, front yards and other development standards as are appropri ate for <br />the specific uses requested at the time of consideration of the PUD development plan <br />required by Section 18.68.110. Said standards shall be included as conditions to any <br />approved PUD development plan. <br />As proposed, not all the lots meet the minimum lot width of 175 feet. Specifically, six lots (Lots <br />2-7) are 165 feet in width, which is 10 feet narrower than what is stated in the HVSP. This 5 <br />percent difference from standard would not substantially diminish the semi-rural feel or <br />spacious layout of these one-acre plus lots. Additionally, the overall lot pattern is consistent <br />and logical with wider lots located when a street curves and at street corners. Staff finds the <br />proposed site layout and development standards meet the PUD requir ements and the HVSP. <br />Senate Bill 9 <br />Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) provides for ministerial (by-right) approval of two-unit housing <br />developments and urban lot splits in single-family residential zones that meet certain criteria. <br />This state law goes into effect on January 1, 2022 . SB 9 specifies several parameters around <br />development of resulting units and lots. Although it generally restricts discretionary review, it <br />does allow objective design, development, and subdivision standards to be applied by local <br />jurisdictions. The Planning Commission reviewed draft amendments to the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code (PMC) at the October 27, 2021 meeting and provided a recommendation to <br />the City Council with minor amendments. The City Council subsequently introduced an <br />ordinance at the November 16, 2021 meeting to amend the PMC to implement SB 9 and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.