14 ATTACHMENT 1-5 - Laserfiche WebLink

Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 December 8, 2021 Commissioner Nibert added that he would also like safety improvements in the conditions of approval. He stated he toured the project at the same time as Commissioner Morgan but they did not discuss the project. Commissioner Pace encouraged the Planning Commission to recommend the Council address traffic safety concerns. Chair Brown asked about speed lumps. Mr. Tassano explained the petition / approval process for speed lumps. Commissioner Morgan asked if cost was the only factor preventing building the one-third mile trail. Ms. Clark discussed constraints including a drainage channel, narrow right-of-way and private improvements that had been built within the right-of-way. Commissioner Nibert asked about Condition of Approval No. 120 regarding installation of traffic calming measures. Mr. Tassano explained that the City usually ran the traffic calming program to help guide the residents. Commissioner Nibert then asked how the City ensured conditions of approval were met. Ms. Clark explained that milestones were typically established based on subsequent permitting and project entitlement. Commissioner Nibert pointed out the need for affordable housing and in lieu fees associated with the project. Commissioner Allen stated she did not support the prior 39-unit project but supported the current proposal because it was consistent with zoning, maintained a semi-rural feel and she was impressed that it would be self-sustainable. She suggested mandating or upgrading Condition 18 so that the trail was required to be implemented as part of the project and prior to occupancy and that funding be negotiated between the City and applicant. Commissioner Morgan added that he was supportive of the project because it met the Happy Valley Specific Plan, had large lots, and included the conservation easement. He indicated support for Vice Chair Allen’s suggestion regarding the trail. Commissioner Pace thanked Staff for its work on the project and the applicant’s work with the community. Chair Brown concurred and stated the project, as proposed, was in keeping with the existing community and within the HVSP. Commissioner Allen moved to approve PUD-138 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8616, with Condition 18 modified to state that the Happy Valley Alisal Trail was required as part of the project and prior to occupancy and that funding would be negotiated between the applicant and the City. Commissioner Nibert seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Allen, Brown, Nibert, and Pace NOES: None DRAFT