Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 December 8, 2021 <br /> <br /> <br />Sandy Richert provided comments on Item 7 and shared her support of the project and concerns <br />about traffic and safety. <br /> <br />Michelle Price provided comments on Item 7 and shared her concerns about traffic and safety. <br /> <br />David Muller provided comments on Item 7 and shared his support for the project. <br /> <br />Marianne Spotorno provided comments on Item 7 and shared her support of the project. <br /> <br />Steve Mix provided comments on Item 7 and shared his concerns about traffic and safety and <br />existence of salamanders. <br /> <br />Steven Van Dorn, Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce, provided comments on Item 7 and shared <br />his support for the project. <br /> <br />Dell Kios provided comments on Item 7 and shared his concerns about traffic and safety and <br />water. <br /> <br />Mr. Inderbitzen responded to public comments, indicating the traffic study addressed traffic <br />concerns and mitigation agreements would address the biological analysis. John Spotorno <br />explained capture of runoff and efforts to reuse the water, as well as following all regulations. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner Allen asked how safety would be improved and about the one-third mile trail from <br />Alisal to Sycamore Creek. City Traffic Engineer Tassano confirmed that the additional one-third <br />mile was the trail along Alisal. He discussed long-term safety concerns and potential <br />improvements including a four way stop, traffic circle, speed lumps, construction traffic <br />enforcement and turn restrictions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Allen asked if the project could be conditioned to build the one-third mile trail <br />segment to improve safety and then the City would pick up the funding for other traffic mitigation. <br />She discussed the prior mitigation to build a bypass road. Chair Brown asked if the one-third <br />mile trail was an off-road trail or sidewalk. Director Clark confirmed that it was a decomposed <br />granite path. He questioned whether the cost of the trail could be included in the project. <br />Commission Nibert interjected that he had the same question and asked if it could be included <br />as part of Condition of Approval 18. Ms. Clark stated that the City expected to construct the third- <br />mile trail on Alisal as laid out in the Happy Valley Specific Plan. She concurred that it may be a <br />benefit for the trail to be constructed in conjunction with the project and suggested the possible <br />trade off of fees to offset the applicant’s construction costs. She stated the project increased <br />traffic but were not the cause of safety concerns, which were preexisting. <br /> <br />Chair Brown agreed that the project was not causing the traffic concerns but could add to the <br />problem. He stated he was supportive of the project but he would like to see additional <br />commitments, conditions, regarding safety. <br /> DRAFT