Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Environmental Checklist Initial Study/Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />126 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />b) Conflict with Applicable Land Use Plans, Policies, or Regulations <br />Would the project: Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use <br />plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />environmental effect? <br />The 1998 HVSP FEIR determined that the project would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or <br />regulation because the proposed project would maintain compatibility between existing residences <br />and new housing, as well as urban and agricultural uses. The HVSP would maintain the rural <br />character of the planning area and buffer residential uses from agricultural uses. Additionally, the <br />City’s planning efforts, including the General Plan, the North Sycamore Specific Plan (which guides <br />development for the area to the north of the Spotorno property and Happy Valley), and the HVSP <br />seek to guide land development in a manner that will establish and maintain compatibility between <br />land uses. The 1998 HVSP FEIR previously analyzed the fact that adoption of the HVSP would result <br />in the conversion of unimproved open space, largely utilized for livestock grazing, into housing and <br />associated roadways. The conversion of agricultural land to residential was considered in the 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR as a cumulative impact (Cumulative Impact A1 “Conversion of land for agricultural to <br />urban use”) that cannot be mitigated. <br />General Plan <br />The applicable General Plan policies pertain to the character of the site, the consistency of <br />development standards with adjoining properties, adherence to General Plan density requirements, <br />and the City’s general policy of protecting and preserving open space. The proposed project would <br />be designed to be consistent with the adjoining properties and would include the permanent <br />dedication of 81 acres of agricultural open space, which would be designated/zoned A/OS. <br />Urban Growth Boundary (Measure FF) <br />The proposed project would be consistent with Measure FF. The City’s UGB generally aligns with the <br />eastern boundary of the Spotorno Flat Area. The eastern (Spotorno Hill) portion of the <br />approximately 112-acre property, the Parcel C area that is not proposed for development, is located <br />outside the UGB line but within the city limits. <br />Measure PP and Measure QQ <br />Measure PP limits the placement of housing units and structures on slopes of 25 percent or greater. <br />Measure QQ reaffirmed and readopted policies in the then existing General Plan to preserve scenic <br />hillside and ridge views and protect open space. The proposed project would be consistent with <br />Measure PP and Measure QQ because it would site structures in the portion of the site that does not <br />exceed 10 percent slope and would permanently preserve approximately 81 acres as open space. <br />Happy Valley Specific Plan <br />The project site is within the HVSP and guided by the corresponding objectives, policies and general <br />direction. The HVSP identifies objectives, policies, and design standards to simplify the subsequent <br />planning process and allow for more efficient and timely approvals of uses. All new homes within the <br />HVSP are required to follow the policies and general direction set forth in the HVSP for guiding <br />growth. The HVSP contemplated the development of 183 homes within the HVSP area, as well as the