14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E

City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project Initial Study/Consistency Checklist Environmental Checklist FirstCarbon Solutions 127 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx development of various circulation improvements, including the Bypass Road. Implementation of the proposed project would result fewer homes than initially contemplated by the HVSP and would not include the development of Bypass Road and would therefore not result in greater impacts than those analyzed in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. (As noted earlier, the first segment of the Bypass Road on HVSP Lots 97 and 97 is not proposed; therefore, no Bypass Road is required for the subject Lot 98, which would avoid creating an unused dead end.) The proposed project would conform to the minimum setbacks, height limits, and floor area ratio (FAR ) requirements for the SRDR district and with the development standards and guidelines that were adopted as mitigation measures in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with the HVSP to preserve the semi-rural development of the HVSP, preserve open space, and maintain compatibility between properties within the HVSP area. Although the proposed project would convert grazing land to a non-agricultural use, this impact was identified in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. Additionally, the 1998 HVSP FEIR included measures to maintain compatibility between urban, residential, and agricultural uses, including MM A1, MM A2, and MM A4. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any peculiar effects and would not result in new or more severe impacts related to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation beyond what was previously analyzed in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. FEIR Mitigation Measures The following site development standards and guidelines were adopted as mitigation measures as part of the 1998 HVSP FEIR. MM A1 Land use standards, site development standards, and design guidelines apply to all developments in the Specific Plan Area. Timing: Land use standards for each use category, as well as some site development standards and design guidelines for some land use categories, are defined in the Specific Plan. Site development standards and design guidelines for the remaining land use categories are to be defined at a (specified) later time, as detailed below in Table 2: Table 2: Timing of Implementation for Site Development Standards, and Design Guidelines No. Land Use Site Development Standards Design Guidelines 4 PUD—Semi-Rural Density Residential District (Greater Happy Valley) Established in Specific Plan. Established in Specific Plan. 6 PUD—Open Space Established in Specific Plan. Established in Specific Plan. MM A2 Agricultural uses in areas within and adjacent to the Specific Plan Area are protected from urban encroachment by making the future owners/tenants of land within the Plan Area aware of the nearby location and potential impacts of agricultural operations prior to moving to the area. Notification is to be achieved through