My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Environmental Checklist Initial Study/Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />136 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />As shown in Table 3 the highest traffic noise level increase would occur along Happy Valley Road <br />west of Alisal Street, under Existing Plus Project conditions. Along this roadway segment, an increase <br />of 1.6 dBA under would occur under Plus Project conditions, compared to conditions that would <br />exist without the proposed project. This is not greater than a 3 dBA increase that would be <br />considered a substantial increase. The 1998 HVSP FEIR found that noise along roadways would not <br />be a significant impact. Therefore, project-related traffic noise impacts of the proposed 22-unit <br />project would be no different, and the conclusions of the 1998 HVSP FEIR remain the same. <br />b) Groundborne Vibration <br />Would the project result in: Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise <br />levels? <br />Short-term Construction Vibration Impacts to Off-site Receptors <br />The 1998 HVSP FEIR did not address the question of groundborne vibration. <br />Of the variety of equipment used during construction, vibratory rollers that would be used in the site <br />preparation phase of construction would produce the greatest groundborne vibration levels. Impact <br />equipment such as pile drivers is not expected to be used during construction of the proposed <br />project. Large vibratory rollers produce groundborne vibration levels ranging up to 0.210 inch per <br />second (in/sec) peak particle velocity (PPV) at 25 feet from the operating equipment. <br />The nearest off-site receptor is a residential home located approximately 90 feet from the <br />construction footprint of proposed structures where heavy equipment would be operating. At this <br />distance, operation of the large vibratory rollers could result in groundborne vibration levels up to <br />0.03 PPV. This is well below the Federal Transit Administration (FTA ) damage threshold criteria of <br />0.12 PPV for even the most fragile structures. Therefore, the impact of short-term groundborne <br />vibration associated with construction to off-site receptors would be less than significant, and the <br />proposed project would not result in any peculiar effects and would not result in new or more severe <br />impacts related to groundborne construction vibration beyond what was previously analyzed in the <br />1998 HVSP FEIR. <br />Operational Vibration Impacts <br />1998 Happy Valley Specific Plan <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not include any permanent sources of vibration that <br />would expose persons in the project vicinity to groundborne vibration levels that could be <br />perceptible without instruments at any existing sensitive land use in the vicinity of the project site. In <br />addition, there are no existing significant permanent sources of groundborne vibration in the vicinity <br />of the site to which the proposed project would be exposed. The project site is located more than <br />4,000 feet from the closest lane on I-680. This distance is sufficient to attenuate any vibration from <br />transportation sources to levels that would not be perceptible without instruments within the site. <br />Therefore, project operational groundborne vibration level impacts would be considered less than <br />significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any peculiar effects and would not <br />result in new or more severe impacts related to operational vibration beyond what was previously <br />analyzed in the 1998 HVSP FEIR.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.