My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Initial Study/Consistency Checklist Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 169 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />Environmental Issues <br />CEQA Section 15183(b) Criteria <br />Prior 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR <br />Determination <br />Effect <br />Peculiar to <br />Project or <br />Site? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Effect? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Off-site, <br />Cumulative <br />Impact? <br />New <br />Information, <br />More Severe <br />Adverse <br />Impact? <br />4.19 Wildfire <br />If located in or near State Responsibility Areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, <br />would the project: <br />a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency <br />response plan or emergency evacuation <br />plan? <br />None No No No No <br />b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other <br />factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and <br />thereby expose project occupants to, <br />pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or <br />the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? <br />None No No No No <br />c) Require the installation or maintenance of <br />associated infrastructure (such as roads, <br />fuel breaks, emergency water sources, <br />power lines or other utilities) that may <br />exacerbate fire risk or that may result in <br />temporary or ongoing impacts to the <br />environment? <br />None No No No No <br />d) Expose people or structures to significant <br />risks, including downslope or downstream <br />flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, <br />post-fire slope instability, or drainage <br />changes? <br />None No No No No <br /> <br />a) Emergency Response/Evacuation Plan Consistency <br />Would the project: If located in or near State Responsibility Areas or lands classified as very high fire <br />hazard severity zones, substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan <br />or emergency evacuation plan? <br />This impact question was not included in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. Therefore, no determination was <br />made in the 1998 HVSP FEIR regarding the significance level for impacts related to consistency with <br />an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan within an SRA or very high fire hazard <br />severity zone. The 1998 HVSP FEIR determined that development according to the HVSP would <br />contribute to demands for fire protection that would eventually expose additional portions of the <br />fire service area to risk in the form of response times exceeding 5 minutes; this impact was discussed <br />in Section 4.16, Public Services.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.