My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary of 2018 Spotorno Ranch Air Quality Analysis <br />March 22, 2021 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACTS <br />Air Quality Assessment <br />The City of Pleasanton in Alameda County is located within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, which is <br />regulated by the EPA, the California Air Resources Board (ARB), and the Bay Area Air Quality <br />Management District (BAAQMD). Pollutants of concern within the Alameda County include ozone (03), <br />carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), inhalable coarse particles (PM10), and <br />fine particulate matter (PM2.5). <br />Impact Analysis <br />Impact AIR-1. Consistency with Air Quality Management Plan <br />The Air Basin is designated non-attainment for state standards for 1-hour and 8-hour ozone, 24-hour <br />respirable particulate matter (PM10), annual PM10, and annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5).1 The Air <br />Basin is also non-attainment for the federal ozone and PM2.5 federal standards. A project would be <br />judged to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the regional Air Quality Plan (AQP) if it would <br />result in substantial new regional emissions not foreseen in the air quality management planning <br />process. <br />The BAAQMD does not provide a numerical threshold of significance for project-level consistency <br />analysis. Therefore, the following criteria will be used for determining a project’s consistency with the <br />AQP: <br />• Criterion 1: Does the project support the primary goals of the AQP? <br />• Criterion 2: Does the project include applicable control measures from the AQP? <br />• Criterion 3: Does the project disrupt or hinder implementation of any AQP control measures? <br /> <br />Criterion 1: Support Primary Goals of AQP <br />Consistency with the Assumptions in AQP <br />The primary way of determining whether a project is consistent with the AQP’s assumptions is to <br />determine if the General Plan is consistent with the growth assumptions used in the AQPs for the Air <br />Basin, and if the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan. The proposed project is generally <br />consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the City of Pleasanton General Plan and the Happy <br />Valley Specific Plan (HVSP). The 2005–2025 General Plan designates the project site as Low Density <br />Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Open Space—Public Health and Safety. The HVSP <br />designates the project site as PUD—Medium Density Residential (PUD-MDR); PUD—Semi-Rural Density <br />Residential (PUD-SRDR); and PUD—Agriculture/Open Space (PUD-AG/OS). <br /> <br /> <br />1 BAAQMD. 2017. Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status. January. Website: http://www.baaqmd.gov/research-and-data/air-quality- <br />standards-and-attainment-status. Accessed March 30, 2018.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.