My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
61 <br />3.3.7 Potential Impacts to American Badgers <br />Impact. Areas that would be impacted by the project currently provide very marginal habitat for <br />badgers due to the lack of a significant small mammal prey base (as a result of longterm <br />abatement of ground squirrels and other small mammals on the site) and no badgers or potential <br />badger dens have been observed in these areas. However, should conditions change on the site in <br />the future prior to project implementation, badgers potentially could occur on the site and <br />establish dens. The project already includes the preservation of approximately 81 acres of open <br />space with a habitat management plan that provides potential foraging, denning and breeding <br />habitat for this species which would more than compensate for a loss of approximately 28 to 30 <br />acres of such potential habitat and result in a less than significant impact on badger habitat. <br />However, should badgers occur on the site during project implementation, this may result in <br />harm or mortality to individual badgers, and this would be considered a significant impact under <br />CEQA. <br />Mitigation. Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce impacts to <br />individual American badgers to a less-than-significant level. <br />Avoidance. Pre-construction surveys that will be conducted for burrowing owls will also be used <br />to determine the presence or absence of badgers in the development and slope stabilization <br />footprint, as well as within 300 feet of these areas. <br />If an active badger den is identified during pre-construction surveys within or immediately <br />adjacent to any impacted areas, a construction-free buffer of up to 300 ft. (or distance specified <br />by the resource agencies, i.e., CDFW) will be established around the den. Because badgers are <br />known to use multiple burrows in a breeding burrow complex, a biological monitor should be <br />present on the site during project development activities to ensure the buffer is adequate to avoid <br />direct impact to individuals or den abandonment. The monitor would be necessary on the site <br />until it is determined that young are of an independent age and project development activities <br />would not harm individual badgers. <br />Once it has been determined that badgers have vacated the site, the burrows can be collapsed or <br />excavated, and ground disturbance can proceed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.