Laserfiche WebLink
Previous GHG Emissions Inventories <br /> <br />Pleasanton Climate Action Plan Update 9 <br />Table 3 GHG Emissions Comparison Between CAP 1.0 and CAP 2.0 2005 Inventories <br /> <br />2005 CAP 1.0 <br />Emissions (MT CO2e)28 <br />Updated 2005 <br />CAP 2.0 Emissions <br />(MT CO2e) Percent Change <br />Residential Electricity 46,881 46,782 -0.21% <br />Residential Gas 66,684 66,175 -0.76% <br />Nonresidential Electricity 105,107 89,385 -14.96% <br />Nonresidential Gas 46,753 43,094 -7.83% <br />Direct Access Electricity N/A1 21,479 - <br />On-road Transportation 401,550 386,963 -3.63% <br />Off-road Transportation 25,410 117,067 +360.71% <br />Solid Waste Disposal 38,8261 35,497 -8.57% <br />Water and Wastewater 34,264 6,689 -80.48% <br />Municipal Operations 5,370 N/A2 - <br />Total 770,884 813,131 +5.48% <br />kWh: kilowatt hours; mgy: million gallons per year; N/A: not applicable; MT CO2e: metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; VMT: <br />vehicle miles traveled <br />1: Direct access electricity data included in nonresidential electricity category. <br />2: Municipal operations are a subset of community emissions in the updated 2005 CAP 2.0 inventory and were not calculated <br />separately. <br />2.3 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2017 East Bay Energy Watch <br />Inventories <br />In 2019, East Bay Energy Watch (EBEW) developed GHG inventories for jurisdictions across the Bay <br />Area. GHG inventories for 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2017 were established for Pleasanton as a part of this <br />effort (referred to from here as the EBEW inventories). Although the EBEW inventories use slightly <br />different methodologies than the 2005 inventory, due to the availability of data, the consistency <br />between years and between jurisdictions, and the use of the most recent emission factors and data <br />sources, Pleasanton has adopted the EBEW inventories and will incorporate them into the CAP process. <br />The most significant differences between the EBEW inventories and CAP 1.0 2005 inventory is that the <br />CAP 1.0 2005 inventory used the Alameda County Traffic Commission’s Countywide Traffic Demand <br />Model for VMT data modeling, while the EBEW CAP 2.0 inventories (2005, 2010, 2015, and 2017) utilize <br />the Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) VMT data model for VMT data and <br />projections. This led to a significant increase in on-road VMT activity data and on-road transportation <br />emissions compared to the CAP 1.0 2005 inventory. <br />In addition, several updates were performed as part of the current effort to adjust the EBEW <br />inventories specifically to Pleasanton and create a single methodology across the 2005, 2010, 2015, <br />and 2017 inventories. These included adding natural gas emissions from the industrial sector in 2015 <br />(due to the data being unavailable from PG&E reporting due to CPUC privacy rules) and updating the <br />waste and water sections to better reflect the specific conditions in Pleasanton. <br /> <br />28 Original 2005 CAP 1.0 inventory here refers to the 2012 CAP 1.0 inventory, which had previously been updated from ICLEI’s 2005 inventory <br />(completed in 2008 for use in Pleasanton’s 2012 CAP 1.0).