My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
060722
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2022 3:43:26 PM
Creation date
6/2/2022 3:37:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/7/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TVTC Strategic Expenditure Plan 2022 Update │ Chapter 3: Project Prioritization <br />Draft Final Report │ Adopted: April 29, 2022 5 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 3: PROJECT PRIORITIZATION <br />Historically, the TAC and TVTC have prioritized the use of TVTDF funding to leverage other federal or <br />state funds in order to advance a project to its next stage, rather than to fully fund any single project in its <br />entirety. For example, the funds could be used as the local match for other grant money. Or, the money <br />could be used to fund the next project development phase, such as a PSR, which is typically assumed to <br />cost 5% of the total project cost, or the PS&E, which is typically assumed to cost about 10% of the total <br />project cost. <br />Forecasted revenue generated by the TVTDF for the 10-year SEP horizon period is not sufficient to <br />providing funding for all eligible projects, therefore projects are ranked to determine funding priority based <br />on the criteria presented in the following section. <br />PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA <br />All projects (List A, List B, and List C) were prioritized using the following five criteria: 1) Project Urgency, <br />2) TVTDF Allocation, 3) Project Readiness, 4) Project Funding, and 5) Project Effectiveness. Each <br />criterion was given a score between 0 and 3 points based on the scoring criteria presented in Table 1. <br />Table 1: Project Prioritization <br />Funding <br />Criteria Description Scoring Criteria <br />Project <br />Urgency <br />How urgent is the project? <br />Is the project expected to move forward in <br />the ten-year SEP horizon? <br />Low Urgency = 1 <br />Medium Urgency = 2 <br />High Urgency = 3 <br />TVTDF <br />Allocation <br />What is the % TVTDF allocation does the <br />project currently have? <br />>30% = 0 <br />>20%-30% = 1 <br />>10%-20% = 2 <br />≤ 10% = 3 <br />Project <br />Readiness <br />How ready is a project is to expend capital <br />funds? <br />What stage the project is in? <br />Score 0.5 – 3 based on what current stage <br />(e.g. PSR = 1, Construction = 3) <br />Project <br />Funding <br />How much total funding is committed for <br />the project? <br />Score = (Total Funding Committed / Total <br />Cost) x3 <br />Project <br />Effectiveness <br />How well does the Project aligns with Lead <br />Agency Policy/Goals <br />Well aligned with agency policy (e.g. In <br />General Plan) = 3 <br />Aligned with agency policy = 2 <br />Not well aligned with agency policy = 1 <br />The score for each funding criteria was the totaled and normalized to a 10-point scale to calculate the <br />project’s priority score. Projects eligible to receive funding were then ranked base on their resultant <br />priority score. It should be noted that this priority ranking was provided to help the TVTC TAC and SEP <br />Subcommittee make informed decision on how to prioritize project funding and are provided to facilitate <br />the decision-making process. The ultimate prioritization is determined by the TVTC board. <br />The results of the project prioritization are included as Appendix B. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.