01 - Laserfiche WebLink

to see if it works. He suggested as another alternative resuming the shifting they were doing earlier on the Tangerine Plan. In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Mr. Wagaman confirmed the change along Division Street would start to create similarities with the Yellow Map but would reverse how the Ironwood area modifications are being requested. He added they would also have to change the boundary line through the Hacienda business park because it was done using school enrollment boundaries and rejected by Council. In response to Councilmember Arkin's inquiries, Mr. Wagaman stated Danbury Park is about 500 people so it could be shifted without any additional swaps. He stated Heritage Valley and Danbury Park combine to be about 1,300 people and either could or could not be resolved without any additional changes. In response to Mr. Wagaman's inquiry, Councilmember Arkin stated this should be looked at and she would be willing to alter her motion if it works. In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Mr. Wagaman stated Ironhorse Trail could be a suitable dividing line. In response to Mr. Wagaman's inquiry, Mayor Brown confirmed this is still considered debate and discussion even though there is a motion on the table. Mr. Wagaman confirmed moving Danbury Park to District 2 would keep the map within permissible deviations. He reported moving both Danbury Park and Heritage Valley to District 2 would put District 2 at +5.1% and District 4 at -4.7% creating an acceptable deviation of 9.8%. Councilmember Arkin stated if they can confirm compliance, she would modify her motion to include Danbury Park and Heritage Valley into the Tangerine Plan's District 2. Mr. Wagaman stated the modified Tangerine Plan has similarities to the Yellow Map in this section of the city. In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Councilmember Balch stated the revised map is more agreeable to him but he is challenged on whether it is enough of a change to earn his vote. He stated it is not a superior plan to ether the Cherry, Currant, or Lime Plans. He stated it does not communicate well to residents who will represent them but expressed appreciation for the change. He added he also still has a challenge with Bondi Ranch. Councilmember Narum stated the change is positive but does not address dividing Lund Ranch and running the boundary down a residential street which goes against everything the Council has said about not splitting neighborhoods. Mayor Brown expressed disappointment they cannot find a solution to the Bondi Ranch quandary. In response to Councilmember Testa's inquiry, Mr. Wagaman stated there is no obvious solution to the Bondi Ranch dilemma because of the census blocks. He added the only solution is to move a much larger chunk of the population which triggers much larger changes elsewhere. In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Mr. Wagaman stated the two solutions he heard were either moving the Tangerine Plan's District 3 eastward or moving District 4 westward. He added either way it is a substantial piece of geography and a significant amount of people to move to keep the neighborhood whole. He added some of the other plans reflect the needed changes. City Council Minutes Page 10 of 14 February 24, 2022