Laserfiche WebLink
City Attorney Sodergren stated his understanding is the motion has been amended and the maker of <br /> the second has to express their support for the amendment. <br /> Councilmember Testa expressed her support for the amendment to the original motion. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Councilmember Arkin stated they attempted to rotate the map to <br /> eliminate the cauliflower ear around Bondi Ranch. <br /> Mayor Brown clarified Councilmember Arkin was instead adjusting the Tangerine Plan between <br /> Districts 2 and 4 earlier. Mr. Wagaman confirmed Mayor Brown's recollection of the live map-drawing <br /> exercise, adding they did not address the Bondi Park area. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Councilmember Arkin agreed to have another live map-drawing <br /> exercise performed. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Councilmember Testa stated she would like to find a solution to <br /> the Lund Ranch issue. <br /> Mr. Wagaman confirmed moving the oblong Bondi Ranch census block into District 3 would then split <br /> Vintage Hills. <br /> In response to City Attorney Sodergren's inquiry, Mr. Wagaman displayed the amended Tangerine <br /> Plan, moving the Danbury Park and Heritage Valley neighborhoods to District 2. <br /> In response to Mr. Wagaman's inquiry, Councilmember Arkin confirmed the map displayed matches her <br /> amended motion. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin's inquiry, Mr. Wagaman confirmed the modified Tangerine Plan is <br /> within legally acceptable population deviations with a total deviation of 9.8%. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Councilmember Testa confirmed her second of the amended <br /> motion to approve the modified Tangerine Plan. <br /> Councilmember Balch expressed his appreciation for the attempt to move Danbury Park but added he <br /> cannot support the motion because of the high deviation. He stated if equal population and <br /> representation matter, they should stick to a plan with better balance. <br /> Councilmember Narum expressed her disappointment the City would want a plan with almost a 10% <br /> deviation when plans exist coming in at under 2% and 4% without splitting neighborhoods and are more <br /> easily understandable. She stated this map goes against everything said in previous meetings and she <br /> does not understand its support. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin's inquiry, Mr. Wagaman reported in the proposed modified <br /> Tangerine Plan, District 1 would have 19,721 people, District 2 would have 20,989, District 3 would <br /> have 20,146, and District 4 would have 19,038. He added the largest district would be at +1,015 and <br /> the smallest at -936, making the difference between the largest and smallest districts about 2,000 <br /> people. <br /> Councilmember Arkin stated she would be amenable to reverting to the original Tangerine Plan for its <br /> smaller deviation if there is support. She added she could also go for just Danbury Park joining District <br /> 2 but stated it seems logical to have Heritage Park go with it and use the Ironhorse Trail as a divider. <br /> Mayor Brown stated she would prefer reverting to the original Tangerine Plan with its population <br /> deviation of 3.7%. She stated it used main roads and keeps communities of interest whole. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 11 of 14 February 24, 2022 <br />