Laserfiche WebLink
witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this [DAY] day of [MONTH], [YEAR]. <br />Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk, City of Pleasanton, Alameda County, State of California <br />[SIGNATURE LINE]". <br />(Address this condition prior to map approval) <br />47. SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT: Public improvements required as part of <br />the subdivision must be either completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to <br />map approval, or guaranteed by a Subdivision Agreement. The agreement requires the <br />applicant to post financial security in the form of either a cash deposit, letter of credit, or <br />surety bonds in amounts equivalent to the value of the public improvements. If surety <br />bonds are utilized, the form of the bond language shall be consistent with California <br />Government Code §66499.1 for faithful performance and §66499.2 for labor and <br />materials. The amounts of the bonds shall be 100% of the total estimated value of the <br />public improvements consistent with §66499.3. In addition, the City requires a warranty <br />bond (often referred to as a maintenance bond) for 10% of the estimated value. The <br />warranty bond shall be active for one-year following formal acceptance of the <br />improvements. All submitted securities are subject to review and approval by the City <br />Attorney. In addition, final maps and the associated Subdivision Agreement are subject <br />to approval by the City Council. <br />(Address this condition prior to map approval) <br />48. CITY SURVEYOR: The City utilizes the services of an outside consultant to certify the <br />technical accuracy of subdivision maps as City Land Surveyor pursuant to California <br />Government Code §66451.1. In order to provide this service, the consultant will submit a <br />proposal to the City forthe estimated cost of the work. The estimate will be presented to <br />the applicant together with the City's administrative markup according to the City's <br />adopted Master Fee Schedule. Review of the subdivision map cannot commence until <br />the applicant has submitted payment to the City for these costs. If the ultimate fee at the <br />conclusion of the work is less than this payment, the applicant will be refunded the <br />difference. If the ultimate fee is more than this payment, then the applicant shall submit <br />payment for the difference before the consultant certifies the map. <br />The following statement shall be included on the cover sheet of the map: "I, [NAME <br />PROVIDED BY CITY], P.L.S, Acting City Surveyor for the City of Pleasanton, Alameda <br />County, California, do hereby state that I have examined this map entitled "[MAP <br />NAME/NUMBER]", and I am satisfied that said map is technically correct. [SIGNATURE <br />LINE], [DATE], [SPACE FOR STAMP]" <br />(Address this condition prior to map approval) <br />49. DEDICATIONS TO THE CITY: Dedications to the City shall conform to the following <br />standards whether dedicated on a subdivision map or by recorded separate instrument: <br />a. Right-of-way dedications for roadways or similar access shall be offered <br />irrevocably to the City pursuant to California Government Code Section 7050. <br />Right-of-way is defined in Pleasanton Municipal Code §13.04.010. <br />b. Public Service Easements (PSE) shall be granted to the City in accordance with <br />Pleasanton Municipal Code §19.24.190 and 19.36.110. PSEs shall be offered as <br />an easement for public purposes including but not limited to installation, <br />construction, access, and maintenance of all public services facilities above and <br />below the ground surface including poles, wires, conduits, vaults, cabinets, <br />retaining walls, sanitary sewers, storm drains, gas lines, and water lines as well <br />as all those public utilities and appurtenances thereto as subject to regulation <br />under Pleasanton Municipal Code Chapter 13.04. Consistent with California <br />Government Code Section 66439(d)(3), the offer shall include the statement, <br />PUD -145 Planning Commission <br />Page 9 of 17 <br />