My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
120622
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2022 3:37:01 PM
Creation date
11/30/2022 3:31:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/6/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS <br />PMC Section 18.68.110 sets forth the purposes of the PUD District and considerations <br />to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development plan. These purposes and <br />considerations are set forth in the draft Resolution included as Exhibit A and includes <br />whether the plan is in conformance with the City General Plan, in the best interest of <br />public health, safety, and general welfare, and whether the plan would be compatible <br />with developed properties in the vicinity. As described in Exhibit A and based on the <br />information and analysis provided in this Agenda Report, staff recommends the <br />Commission make the required findings to recommend approval of the project. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br />1,000 -foot radius of the site and published in the newspaper. At the time this report was <br />published, staff has not received any public comments. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the <br />California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA), California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan. <br />SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br />Staff has reviewed the subject proposal in accordance with the North Sycamore Specific <br />Plan and believes the proposal is consistent with its regulations and design guidelines. <br />Staff also believes the architectural style and design of the home are appropriate for the <br />North Sycamore Specific Plan Area. Therefore, the project, as conditioned, merits a <br />favorable recommendation by the Commission. <br />Primary Author: Emily Carroll, Assistant Planner, 925-931-5608 or ecarroll ci of leasantonca. ov. <br />Reviewed/Approved By: <br />Julie Harryman, Assistant City Attorney <br />Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager/Deputy Director of Community Development <br />Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br />PUD -145, 535 Sycamore Rd. <br />9 of 9 <br />Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.