Laserfiche WebLink
styles and heights. Figure 5 indicates the proposed fencing style, and more details can <br />be reviewed in the Landscape Plans in Exhibit B. <br />Figure 5: Proposed Fence along Sycamore Road <br />Geotechnical Review <br />While this is not a geologically sensitive area, a Geotechnical Report was provided by <br />CalGeotech dated September 2, 2021, that analyzes the property and provides a <br />number of recommendations regarding site preparations, foundation design, and other <br />pertinent solutions. Ultimately, the report notes the site is suitable for the proposed <br />residence. The Geotechnical Report can be reviewed in further detail in Exhibit C. <br />PROJECT SITE ALTERNATIVES <br />The subject parcel is a legally created lot zoned for residential uses. The proposed <br />subdivision and development meet the intent of the underlying zoning designation. <br />Alternatives include: <br />1. Do not approve the PUD plan, which would only permit a single residence to be <br />constructed on the property; or <br />2. Require a different site layout or home design. <br />The proposed residences large setbacks, extensive landscaping, and articulated <br />building design help mitigate the building height and mass. Alternative 2 is inconsistent <br />with the purpose of the lot which was created for residential purposes and permitting <br />subdivision and development of the subject lot is consistent with the NSSP. The <br />proposed project represents a reasonable development scenario for the site and as <br />such, staff does not recommend any of the alternatives. <br />PUD -145, 535 Sycamore Rd. Planning Commission <br />8 of 9 <br />loliiiiEiii➢iliiiiiiiiii� <br />!!!!!!!EE!lfll!!i!!i!1!!ll�lllllllAllllll!!!l!!llllloH!!7!!! <br />!L7!!!11!! <br />!!11!!!n!l!!!!!!!1!1! <br />i <br />W!!%!�liiAllellllli�liOlsl�Giiii <br />��Yi�e.. .... <br />!!!!l1111lA!llilllllllllllllilll <br />!!!!!IE!lli1R11llalllllllllllulll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!l11111�r!!lq <br />!!llllllll!!llliluilllllllll!!!l!!!!!!!!!!!!!E!l1111111!!f! <br />llllllllllllll....�.....1.lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll:llll <br />!!!!11!!1!!1!llllllllllllllllllllll!!!!!!!!!!!llmlli:a!!!i! <br />!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!111!7!!!! <br />iusiiiaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiivEiii�a.wi <br />INSIDE ELEVATIO <br />'60" HT. 4 -RAIL WOOD FENCE <br />Geotechnical Review <br />While this is not a geologically sensitive area, a Geotechnical Report was provided by <br />CalGeotech dated September 2, 2021, that analyzes the property and provides a <br />number of recommendations regarding site preparations, foundation design, and other <br />pertinent solutions. Ultimately, the report notes the site is suitable for the proposed <br />residence. The Geotechnical Report can be reviewed in further detail in Exhibit C. <br />PROJECT SITE ALTERNATIVES <br />The subject parcel is a legally created lot zoned for residential uses. The proposed <br />subdivision and development meet the intent of the underlying zoning designation. <br />Alternatives include: <br />1. Do not approve the PUD plan, which would only permit a single residence to be <br />constructed on the property; or <br />2. Require a different site layout or home design. <br />The proposed residences large setbacks, extensive landscaping, and articulated <br />building design help mitigate the building height and mass. Alternative 2 is inconsistent <br />with the purpose of the lot which was created for residential purposes and permitting <br />subdivision and development of the subject lot is consistent with the NSSP. The <br />proposed project represents a reasonable development scenario for the site and as <br />such, staff does not recommend any of the alternatives. <br />PUD -145, 535 Sycamore Rd. Planning Commission <br />8 of 9 <br />