My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
020723
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 1:53:33 PM
Creation date
2/2/2023 1:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY <br /> b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably <br /> foreseeable future development during normal, dry,and multiple dry years? <br /> The project would construct a downhill mountain bike trail to replace an existing user-created trail. <br /> The project would not include anyfacilitiesor land uses that require watersupply.The project would <br /> not increase water supply demand and would not reduce the amount of water available to the City. <br /> Therefore,the project would have a no impact on water supply availability. <br /> C) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or <br /> may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in <br /> addition to the provider's existing commitments? <br /> The project would construct a downhill mountain bike trail to replace an existing user-created trail. <br /> The project would not include any facilities or land uses that require wastewater collection and/or <br /> treatment. Therefore, the project would have no impact associated with wastewater treatment <br /> capacity. <br /> d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the <br /> capacity of local infrastructure,or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? <br /> Some debris would be generated during construction of the project. However,the amount of waste <br /> generated would be minor and would be mulched and reused onsite wherever possible. Use and <br /> maintenance of the trail would also generate only minor amounts of solid waste. No impact would <br /> occur associated with solid waste exceeding State or local standards and all solid waste would be <br /> handled in accordance with solid waste reduction goals and recycling mandates. Impacts <br /> associated with solid waste generated by the project would be less than significant. <br /> e) Would the project comply with federal,state, and local management and reduction statutes and <br /> regulations related to solid waste? <br /> Project construction would generate solid waste in the form of organic material and soil. The <br /> amount of waste generated would be minor and would be mulched and reused onsite wherever <br /> possible. Park operations would not generate large quantities of solid waste.Solid waste transport <br /> and disposal would comply with all applicable regulations for solid waste handling, disposal, and <br /> recyclingand no impact would resultfrom non-compliance with applicable statutes and regulations. <br /> Mitigation Measures <br /> No mitigation measures are required. <br /> 12956 <br /> DUDEK 84 April 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.