My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
020723
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 1:53:33 PM
Creation date
2/2/2023 1:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY <br /> prone to geological hazards are mapped on their California Earthquake Hazards Zone <br /> Application (EQ Zapp)(DOC 2019).As noted in the Setting section above,there are several <br /> active faults near the project area, including the Alquist-Priolo designated Calaveras Fault <br /> immediately east of the project site and the Hayward Fault approximately 8 miles west of <br /> the site. <br /> The project would not introduce a new use to the Augustin Bernal Community Park. The <br /> project proposes to construct a mountain bike trail to replace an unofficial user-created <br /> trail.As discussed further in Section 3.16(a),the proposed project could slightly increase <br /> use of the Augustin Bernal Community Park by providing an engineered mountain bike trail <br /> that could be used by mountain bikers with a wider range of experience and skill levels <br /> than the existing trail supports. However, the project is not expected to substantially <br /> increase trail use activity within the park overall because of the existing high volume of trail <br /> use at the park, including on the unofficial user-created trail that the proposed project <br /> would replace,and the potential to divert a portion of existing downhill mountain bike traffic <br /> on the park's multi-use trails to the new trail. <br /> The project does not include any structures or new parking that would be likely to result <br /> pose substantial risk associated with seismic activity. Accordingly, risks associated with <br /> seismic events, including fault rupture, would be less than significant. <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? <br /> Ground shaking can result in structural failure and collapse of structures or cause non- <br /> structural building elements to fail, presenting a hazard to building occupants and <br /> contents.The project site is located in an area of moderate earthquake hazard. As noted <br /> above, the project would construct a mountain bike trail to replace an unofficial user- <br /> created trail and trail spurs, and the project would not substantially increase trail use <br /> activity within the park. The project would not construct any structures or parking areas. <br /> Although trail users could be exposed to strongseismic ground shaking,the project would <br /> not substantially increase risks associated with seismic activity because it would not <br /> substantially increase use of the park and therefore would not significantly increase the <br /> risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking. Thus, this impact <br /> would be less than significant. <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? <br /> Liquefaction generally occurs as a result of strong ground shaking in areas where granular <br /> sediment or fill material either contains or is located immediately above high moisture <br /> content. The ground shaking transforms the material from a solid state to a temporarily <br /> liquid state. Liquefaction is a serious hazard because buildings in areas that experience <br /> liquefaction may sink or suffer major structural damage. The project would not construct <br /> structures and would not increase the potential for liquefaction to occur within the park. <br /> Liquefaction typically occurs during or following heavy precipitation events, during which <br /> use of the proposed mountain bike trail would be very low. As the project would not <br /> substantially increase use of the park and use of the trail would be low during conditions <br /> under which liquefaction risks are highest,the project would not increase the risk of loss, <br /> injury,or death due to liquefaction.Thus,this impact would be less than significant. <br /> 12956 <br /> DUDEK 53 April 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.