Laserfiche WebLink
AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY <br /> stabilizers, revegetation,or other appropriate measures.Site stabilization and pollution prevention <br /> measures are noted on Sheets N-1 and N-2 of the trail design plans provided in Appendix A. <br /> In the absence of properdrainage controls and vegetation cover following grading and construction, <br /> long-term erosion-induced sedimentation of downstream water bodies could occur. However, <br /> implementation of MM-GEO-1 would ensure that erosion is minimized through long-term drainage <br /> control, placement of erosion control mats, and seeding following construction. With <br /> implementation of the site stabilization and pollution prevention measures identified in the trail <br /> design plans and in MM-GEO-1, construction and operational impacts to downstream drainages <br /> would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise <br /> substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.With implementation of MM-GEO-1, impacts <br /> from degradation of water quality or violation of water quality standards during construction and <br /> project operation would be less than significant.Therefore, impacts would be less than significant <br /> with mitigation incorporated. <br /> b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with <br /> groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management <br /> of the basin? <br /> The project would not rely on any groundwater sources and would not develop or use a groundwater <br /> supply well. Further,the project does not include any paving or other new impervious surfaces that <br /> could interfere with groundwater recharge.Thus,the project would not contribute to the depletion <br /> of groundwater supplies through use of groundwater or reduction of groundwater recharge and the <br /> project would have no impact associated with the potential to impede sustainable groundwater <br /> management. <br /> C) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including <br /> through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious <br /> surfaces, in a manner which would: <br /> i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site? <br /> Construction activities for the proposed project would occur over approximately 3 acres. <br /> Minor grading and vegetation removal would be required but no new impervious surfaces <br /> would be created. Under the existing condition, the project site supports unofficial user- <br /> created trails that have not been appropriately engineering to manage stormwater. This <br /> results in substantial erosion, as shown in the site photographs in Figures 7a and 7b. By <br /> replacing the user-created trail with an engineered trail that incorporates grade reversals <br /> to effectively allow stormwater to flow off of the trail surface and into adjacent vegetation, <br /> the project would reduce the extent of erosion that is currently occurring on the trail <br /> surface. Further,allowing stormwater to flow into adjacent vegetation would reduce runoff <br /> velocities, which in turn would prevent reduce the potential for erosive scour along the <br /> sides of the trail. In addition, implementation of MM-GEO-1 would ensure that erosion is <br /> minimized through long-term drainage control, placement of erosion control mats, and <br /> seeding following construction. As a result, impacts would be less than significant with <br /> 12956 <br /> DUDEK 66 April 2022 <br />