My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
110723 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2023 1:58:17 PM
Creation date
11/6/2023 2:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Christina Casha <br /> From: Ellen Holmgren <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 10:26 AM <br /> To: Vicki <br /> Cc: Pleasanton City Clerk; Norm Dorais; Tamara Baptista <br /> Subject: RE: Agenda item 16 <br /> Dear Vicki LaBarge, <br /> Thank you for your email to the Mayor and City Council. This email acknowledges receipt of your message. <br /> If this comment relates to an item on the current City Council agenda and you would like to submit written public <br /> comment, please visit https://forms.cityofpleasantonca.gov/f/written pub Iiccomment. Please note that the public <br /> comment link will close at 12 p.m. on the Council meeting date, and no comments will be accepted after that time. <br /> Thank you for your interest in the City of Pleasanton. <br /> Regards, <br /> Ellen Holmgren, Administrative Assistant City of Pleasanton <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Vicki<< <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 9:47 AM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <citycouncil@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Subject: Agenda item 16 <br /> *** [EXTERNAL] This message comes from an external organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or <br /> clicking links, especially from unknown senders. *** <br /> Dear Mayor, Council Members and Staff, <br /> Writing again today to implore you do not pass the increases as proposed. 30% is too great a burden to implement in <br /> January 2024. <br /> It seems odd to me that a second look by consultants and staff could suddenly find that only a 12% increase would be <br /> needed in 2025. Maybe a 3rd look would find even less increases are necessary. <br /> If you are considering the reduced increase in 2025 (from 20%down to 12%) why not start with a 21%increase in 2024 <br /> then see what is truly needed in 2025. <br /> In addition, I will say again and keep saying it, stop the irresponsible spend on refurbishing a skatepark and century <br /> house, move the money that came from ARPA to begin with, back to where it can be used for our water, specifically to <br /> help with the new wells needed. That 10.5 million is almost half of what is needed. Do the right thing. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> Vicki LaBarge <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.