My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
020624 REGULAR
>
AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2024 9:38:50 AM
Creation date
2/6/2024 9:33:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/6/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
554
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PAGE 75 <br />•Does this recommendation encourage <br />intergenerational change with a particular <br />emphasis on youth and older adults? <br />Approach Recommendation 2: <br />Community Engagement <br />As described earlier, diversity, equity, and inclusion <br />values (e.g., community engagement, power sharing, <br />and capacity building) were at the center of this <br />process at the outset. As this project progressed, <br />it became apparent that the time required to <br />identify and engage community members had been <br />underestimated due to the region’s relative lack of <br />formalized community engagement infrastructure. <br />Consequently, the timeline was extended so that <br />connections to community members could be forged. <br />It was discovered that community members were <br />eager to be involved and were seeking more formal <br />channels through which they could express their <br />needs and be part of solution identification and <br />implementation. <br />We recommend that more structured and formal <br />engagement mechanisms be created in each of the <br />three cities, as well as for the Tri-Valley region as a <br />whole to ensure this work continues after this report <br />is published. This can ensure ongoing communication <br />channels between community members and city <br />government that will continue to elevate community <br />needs and ensure that nonprofits, city officials, <br />and others are aware of emergent needs between <br />formal needs assessments. More planning is needed <br />to determine how best to engage community <br />members and ensure power sharing between city <br />governments and constituents. At a minimum, these <br />efforts should include a diverse and representative <br />sample of community members, particularly priority <br />populations. <br />One regional example of how to establish and <br />maintain more formal connections is through <br />accountable communities for health (ACHs). <br />According to the California Accountable Community <br />for Health Initiative (CACHI), an ACH is a community- <br />driven collaborative dedicated to making lasting <br />and transformational change in the health of a <br />community and advancing health equity. ACHs <br />provide residents and key partners from diverse <br />sectors an infrastructure for working together to <br />change systems, advance equity, and build stronger, <br />more cohesive communities prepared to mitigate <br />existing and emerging health challenges over the <br />long term. The ACH’s key roles—elevating community <br />voices, facilitating multi-sector dialogues, and aligning <br />organizations and systems—facilitate powerful and <br />sustainable changes that reflect the needs of the <br />community. Additional information about cities <br />employing this model is available in Appendix 2. <br />Approach Recommendation 3: <br />Anticipate Systemic Challenges and <br />Build Organizational Relationships <br />IDENTIFY SYSTEMIC CHALLENGES <br />As noted throughout, many of the topics that <br />arose—such as inflation and cost of living— are more <br />systemic in nature and thus outside the capacity or <br />control of those planning for and delivering human <br />services. Additionally, there was considerable overlap <br />with structures and factors directly affecting human <br />service needs (e.g., transportation) but not within the <br />responsibility or scope of those planning or delivering <br />health or human services. Nevertheless, all of these <br />factors exist within a system, and siloed interventions <br />will have little long-term effect on sustained change <br />and may fail to promote change across the life course. <br />As one organizational interviewee concisely stated, <br />“We need holistic solutions, not just little drops.” <br />We recommend that the Tri-Valley apply a systemic <br />lens to plan for challenges. This requires aligning <br />systems to reduce redundancy and increasing <br />communications so that efforts in the Tri-Valley <br />form a safety net. This involves articulating systemic <br />factors and the relationships between them that <br />are projected to affect Tri-Valley residents and <br />organizations dedicated to serving them. Then, <br />significant efforts must be made to build relationships <br />with aligned entities to meet resident needs and <br />reduce service isolation. Throughout this needs <br />assessment, residents and nonprofit organization <br />staff spoke of the need to anticipate climate <br />change and another public health emergency such <br />as the COVID-19 pandemic and for proactive and <br />collaborative planning and preparation. This systemic <br />and future-oriented lens must be applied to all <br />decisions about how to plan for and deliver human <br />services in Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton. <br />EASTERN ALAMEDA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES NEEDS ASSESSMENTSS Page 133 of 554
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.