My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
031924
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2024 2:26:47 PM
Creation date
3/19/2024 2:24:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/19/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 5 of 9 <br />Occupancy Tax and Business License Tax, are projected to decrease by 0.7 percent in FY <br />2025/26 and by an additional 1.0 percent in FY 2026/27 before rebounding to grow at 2.0 <br />percent annually starting in FY 2028/29. Recreation fees are not projected to experience any <br />growth in FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27 before growing again at 3.0 percent annually starting in <br />FY 2027/28. Other revenues are projected to grow at 2.0 percent annually. <br /> <br />Expenditure assumptions for this scenario are the same as the baseline scenario to effectively <br />compare the level of change in the fiscal gap when the City’s major revenues are impacted <br />from an economic slowdown/recession. <br /> <br />Under this scenario, the annual deficit on average grows to approximately $22.8 million. With <br />previously mentioned shortfall reduction measures (i.e., utilizing the Section 115 Pension <br />Trust and reducing non-personnel budget), the average annual deficit goes down to $14.7 <br />million. It should be noted that reduced revenues estimated in this scenario only assumes a <br />mild economic downturn or short recession; while it is not likely that any near future economic <br />downturn or recession will be as severe as during the Great Recession, any type of economic <br />downturn will have a major impact on the City’s primary revenues. During the Great <br />Recession, the City’s property tax revenue decreased by as much as 5.0 percent and took five <br />years to recover, finally returning to $50.4 million in FY 2013/14 after initially reaching that <br />number in FY 2008/09. Sales tax took even longer - taking more than seven years to recover - <br />returning to $22.4 million in FY 2014/15 after initially reaching $22.0 million in FY 2006/07 and <br />its revenue decreasing as much as 27.0 percent during this seven-year period. The Great <br />Recession officially lasted 18 months from December 2007 to June 2009, and the only other <br />downturn in recent history was the COVID-19 Recession, which only lasted two months. <br />Unprecedented actions taken by Congress with a series of stimulus measures, combined with <br />quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, helped quell the recession quickly but also fueled <br />economic growth. While most economists are not predicting a recession in the near term, it is <br />highly likely that some type of economic downturn or even recession will occur during the <br />forecasted period from FY 2025/26 to FY 2032/33. <br /> <br />Alternative Scenario 1: Property Tax Revenue <br />With the Tri-Valley's real estate market remaining strong, the City’s property tax revenue grew <br />at a healthy pace in recent years: during the last three years, this revenue grew each year with <br />annual growth ranging from 3.2 percent to 7.3 percent. Assuming this level of growth <br />continuously is not realistic, especially with the supplemental property tax from real estate <br />transactions expected to decrease as the region continues to deal with historically low <br />inventory and decreasing affordability. <br /> <br />Compared to the baseline scenario in which a 3.5 percent annual growth is assumed, if a 4.0 <br />percent annual growth is assumed, an additional $19.6 million in property tax revenue <br />between FY 2025/26 and FY 2032/33, or an annual additional revenue of $2.5 million, is <br />projected. Using 4.5 percent, these amounts go up to $39.7 million over 8 years, or $5.0 <br />million per year. <br /> <br />Alternative Scenario 2: Labor Costs and Unfunded Pension Liabilities <br />As mentioned above in the baseline scenario, personnel costs (excluding pension costs) are <br />assumed to grow at 3.0 percent annually, but when factoring in pension costs and using <br />projections from CalPERS, the overall personnel budget numbers are projected to grow by an <br />average of 3.3 percent annually. However, 3.3 percent may be slightly lower than actual <br />Page 216 of 228
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.