My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
071624
>
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 12:24:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2024 11:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1650
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Merritt Property Project <br />Consistency Checklist 15183 Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />122 <br />or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or <br />excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that some sites, but not Site 22 <br />(Merritt), are within the Alameda County Airport Land Use Policy Plan (ALUPP) <br />Airport Influence Area (AIA) for the Livermore Municipal Airport, which is <br />coterminous with the Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission Hazard <br />Prevention Zone, but that none of the rezoned housing sites are within an <br />Airport Protection Area. (See Exhibit 3.8-2 of the Housing Element Update <br />Draft EIR.) <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that compliance with federal, <br />State, and local regulations, including the General Plan, Alameda County <br />ALUPP AIA, 2011 California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, Code of <br />Federal Regulations Part 77, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) <br />regulations would ensure that impacts related to exposure of people to <br />safety hazards or excessive noise in proximity to an airport would be less than <br />significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The project site is not one of the identified sites within an ALUPP or AIA. As <br />such, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed <br />project. The proposed project would not result in a new or more severe <br />adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Housing Element <br />Update FEIR. <br />f) Emergency Response and Evacuation <br />Would the project: Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted <br />emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that construction equipment and <br />vehicles operated in support of development consistent with the Housing <br />Element Update could potentially impede evacuation or emergency vehicle <br />access. However, construction vehicles would comply with the Tri-Valley <br />LHMP and the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, ensuring <br />efficient response to emergency incidents associated with emergencies <br />affecting the City. Therefore, construction impacts related to emergency <br />response and evacuation would be less than significant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.