Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Merritt Property Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 141 <br />Urban Growth Boundary (Measure FF) <br />Site 22 (Merritt) is within the Urban Growth Boundary. Therefore, impacts <br />would be less than significant. <br />City of Pleasanton Measures PP and QQ <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that, consistent with General <br />Plan, individual development projects would be required to undergo project- <br />specific discretionary environmental review with respect to annexation and <br />development in the City of Pleasanton, including additional analysis to <br />determine consistency with Measure PP. Therefore, development consistent <br />with the Housing Element Update would not conflict with Measures PP or QQ, <br />and impacts would be less than significant. <br />Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated the Livermore Municipal Airport is <br />located approximately 1 mile east of the City of Pleasanton, and some areas <br />of the City are within the flight path for planes taking off and arriving at the <br />Livermore Airport. Site 22 (Merritt) is not located within the Alameda County <br />ALUPP AIA, which is coterminous with the Alameda County Airport Land Use <br />Commission Hazard Prevention Zone, nor within an Airport Protection Area. <br />Developments within the ALUPP’s AIA would be required to undergo federal, <br />State, and local regulatory review processes specific to airport noise, <br />airspace safety, and other land use compatibility standards, including 14 <br />Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 regulations for the safety, efficient use, <br />and preservation of navigable airspaces. In reviewing individual applications, <br />the City would determine which policies and actions apply and whether <br />project modifications would be required to ensure compatibility with the <br />Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). Buildings within the ALUCP AIA <br />would be required to comply with FAA regulations for height. Therefore, <br />development consistent with the Housing Element Update would be <br />consistent with the Alameda County ALUCP and impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The types of barriers or physical features that can divide a community <br />include roads, freeways, railroads, transit lines, and open space that is not <br />developed for recreational use. The project site is bordered by Foothill Road, <br />undeveloped land, and a small subdivision on the west, I-680 to the east, low