My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
071624
>
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 12:24:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2024 11:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1650
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Merritt Property Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 165 <br />smaller household size in senior age-restricted development is growth that <br />had been planned for by the City as forecasted in the City’s Housing Element <br />Update. For more details, please refer to Section XIV, Population and <br />Housing, above. <br />Additionally, the Pleasanton Police Department has indicated that it can <br />serve the proposed project and that there would be no need for new or <br />expanded police facilities.28 The Pleasanton Police Department determined <br />that there were no potential challenges associated with the proposed <br />project. <br />Further, the proposed project would be required to pay capital facilities fees <br />as outlined in Municipal Code Chapter 3.22. Through the capital facilities fee, <br />developers would be responsible for payment of any improvements needed, <br />including the need for new facilities, which would effectively mitigate any <br />increased demand for services associated with the Housing Element Update. <br />The proposed project would be constructed in accordance with applicable <br />General Plan policies and programs, and all project applications would be <br />subject to City review and approval. Therefore, there are no environmental <br />effects that are peculiar to the proposed project. Environmental impacts <br />would be avoided through the imposition of uniformly applied development <br />policies or standards. The proposed project would not result in a new or more <br />severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Housing <br />Element Update FEIR. <br />c) Need for New or Altered School Facilities <br />Would the project: Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the <br />provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need <br />for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the <br />construction of which could cause significant environmental <br />impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response <br />times or other performance objectives schools? <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that development consistent <br />with the Housing Element Update could result in development on all of the <br />rezoned housing sites. If all the sites were to develop at their maximum <br />density, a total of approximately 2,532 K-12 students could be generated, <br />including approximately 1,377 students in Grades K-5, approximately 598 <br /> <br />28 Swing, David L. Chief of Police. Pleasanton Police Department. Personal communication: email. October 10, <br />2023.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.