My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
071624
>
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 12:24:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2024 11:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1650
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Merritt Property Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 167 <br />accommodate the additional staff, facilities and/or equipment. If an existing <br />school site is at capacity for staffing or for students, this could require an <br />expansion of an existing school site or construction of a new school site, the <br />construction of which could cause environmental impacts. The project- <br />specific environmental impacts of constructing new or expanded school <br />facilities to support the growth anticipated as part of the Housing Element <br />Update could not be determined at the time the Housing Element Update <br />FEIR was certified because the site-specific locations and designs of future <br />new or expanded facilities are not known. It can be expected that <br />construction and operation of future new or expanded school facilities would <br />have similar impacts as would construction and operation of other types of <br />new development under the Housing Element Update. Further, the School <br />District would be required to receive approval from the Division of the State <br />Architect and complete any required CEQA review for construction of new <br />or expanded school facilities. <br />As noted above, the payment of statutory fees “. . . is deemed to be full and <br />complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or <br />both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real <br />property. . . on the provision of adequate school facilities.” Therefore, with <br />the payment of required State-established SB 50 fees, future development <br />consistent with the Housing Element Update would not result in significant <br />adverse effects related to school facilities and impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The proposed project would consist of age-restricted, senior housing and, <br />thus, there would be no demand for school services associated with the <br />proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact on <br />the need for new or altered school facilities. Therefore, there are no <br />environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project. The <br />proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact <br />that was not previously identified in the Housing Element Update FEIR.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.